Channel

Блок

@blok2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

304subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001510639231
Type	Channel
Username	@blok2026
Description	Обратная связь: директ Email: [email protected]
Created	Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/blok2026

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 303–305 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:50	304	no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:01	304	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 72
Videos: 20
Links: 76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime: 18m 53s
Average length: 9m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

337 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	143	42.4%
🔥	73	21.7%
❤	30	8.90%
💯	27	8.01%
👎	11	3.26%
😢	8	2.37%
✍	7	2.08%
🤡	7	2.08%
😭	6	1.78%
💩	5	1.48%
👌	4	1.19%
🤯	4	1.19%
👏	3	0.89%
😡	2	0.593%
💔	1	0.297%
🗿	1	0.297%
😁	1	0.297%
😨	1	0.297%
😱	1	0.297%
🤔	1	0.297%
1 further kind	1	0.297%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 07:10 UTC569 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

Блок не примет участия в выборах. 11–17 мая 2026 года пройдут выборы в Координационный совет IV созыва. В условиях продолжающейся «политической зимы» в Республике Беларусь Блок считает важным формирование и развитие устойчивых национальных демократических структур за рубежом и выражает поддержку самому институту Координационного совета. В то же время, опираясь на опыт участия представителей Блока во всех предыдущи…

❤10👎5👌4🤯4😢3👍1💔1😁1

25 Feb 2026, 17:40 UTC601 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Video

Аудит ответов Светланы Тихановской на слушаниях в КС Официальные ответы зафиксировали отсутствие внятной политической цели, дефицит стратегии и, как следствие, результатов. Главное противоречие прозвучало открыто. При заявке на представительство беларусского народа задача возвращения власти не формулируется как политическая цель. Отдельный симптом – полное игнорирование российского фактора. Ключевая экзистенциальн…

🔥13👍10💩5👎2

20 Feb 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,490 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Блок покидает Координационный Совет ㅤ Представители нашего Блока работали в трех созывах КС. За это время нам удалось заложить важные демократические традиции и добиться практических результатов для беларусов: Институт выборов. Именно мы организовали первые демократические выборы в КС-3 по высшим стандартам. Практика прижилась, в мае 2026 года пройдут выборы в КС-4. Реальная помощь. Мы запустили механизм, который р…

🔥16😭6🤡4👎3👏2😢2❤1🤔1

9 Feb 2026, 16:14 UTC657 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ БЛОКА О ПРОЦЕДУРНЫХ НАРУШЕНИЯХ В ХОДЕ СЛУШАНИЙ СВЕТЛАНЫ ТИХАНОВСКОЙ 7 ФЕВРАЛЯ ㅤ Фракция «Беларусы» (Блок), выступая организатором и техническим исполнителем Слушаний Главы ОПК, официально фиксирует обстоятельства их проведения для политического архива. Мы воздерживаемся от эмоциональных оценок, констатируя факты системного искажения принципов парламентаризма. 1. Хронология и попытка слома Регламента. Подго…

👍10🔥7😢3🤡2😡2❤1👏1💯1

7 Feb 2026, 10:08 UTC367 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Слуханні па выніках дзейнасці кіраўніцы Аб’яднанага пераходнага кабінета Беларусі Святланы Ціханоўскай https://www.youtube.com/live/zXpiWKadhj0

👍3

27 Jan 2026, 12:25 UTC467 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каардынацыйная Рада запрашае на слуханні па справе Васіля Верамейчыка Мэта слуханняў: Публічны разгляд інфармацыі, якая з’явілася ў СМІ і грамадскай прасторы, адносна абставінаў, звязаных з забаронай на ўезд Васіля Верамейчыка ва Украіну і Літву, а таксама ацэнка магчымай ролі прадстаўнікоў дэмакратычных структур у гэтых працэсах. Слуханні праводзяцца з мэтай павышэння празрыстасці, падсправаздачнасці і даверу ў дз…

👍8🔥1

9 Jan 2026, 20:02 UTC376 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Медыя-група КС. Гісторыя. 1. Пасля выбараў 2024 года быў сфарміраваны склад медыя-групы ў асобе Арцёма Шапарава, Сяргея Бяспалава і Наталлі Галаўчук. Першапачаткова ў склад працоўнай групы ўваходзілі і іншыя дэлегаты, аднак пасля яны былі адхіленыя ад працы. 2. Ні стратэгія медыя-групы, ні яе мэты, ні KPI ніколі не зацвярджаліся ні Нарадай фракцый, ні агульным зборам Каардынацыйнай рады. 3. Больш за тое, улетку 20…

👍3

9 Jan 2026, 20:02 UTC529 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

13. За прыняцце гэтага рашэння без разгляду мэтазгоднасці дзейнасці і ацэнкі рэальнага кошту работ прагаласавалі: - “Каманда Латушкі і Рух за Свабоду”: Павел Латушка, Яна Латушка, Ігар Сігоў, Рыта Гаціх, Арцём Брухан, Юрась Губарэвіч, Іна Дабратвор, Міхаіл Кірылюк, Уладзімір Астапенка, Кацярына Вадангосава, Павел Батуеў, Ірына Халопіца, Юлія Каміновіч, Міхалевіч, Юры Казакевіч. - "Эўрапейскі выбар": Павел Мар'еўскі…

👍13❤2🔥2

9 Jan 2026, 20:00 UTC278 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заява фракцыі "Беларусы" Фракцыя "Беларусы" паслядоўна выступае за самафінансаванне палітычных арганізацый, а таксама за празрыстасць і падсправаздачнасць дэмакратычных структур. У сувязі з вышэйпададзеным выказваем пратэст супраць прынятага раней кулуарнага рашэння аб прыцягненні да працы ад імя Каардынацыйнай рады падрадчыкаў (медыя-групы) без правядзення адпаведных адкрытых конкурсных працэдур, без вызначэння мэ…

👍3

30 Dec 2025, 10:31 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Блок»

30 Dec 2025, 10:30 UTC608 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На основании принятого (31/10/2025 г.) общим голосованием участников решения «Блок Прокопьева-Егорова» переименован в «Блок». В преддверии новых выборов в Координационный совет использование фамилий в названии фракции становится ограничивающим фактором. Чтобы обеспечить равные возможности для всех новых участников, которые присоединятся к нам в ближайшее время, общим голосованием принято решение о переименовании «Б…

👍17🔥2❤1

16 Dec 2025, 14:22 UTC481 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Есть ли публичные персоны, чьё мнение и чья позиция заслуживают обязательного учитывания? Чьи суждения имеют безусловную авторитетность, даже если отличаются новизной, оригинальностью, или даже парадоксальностью?”, - спросил Мацкевич. Не простой вопрос. До 2015-2016 года в Беларуси был почти полный вакуум лидеров общественного мнения. Пространство выражения публичного мнения было сужено, поделено на официальное и …

❤5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blok2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 943,556 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Валерий Сахащик
@sahashchik · 4521 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блок” (@blok2026), 304 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blok2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.