Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психотерапевт-онлайн

@blogsmalltalk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,302subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001665342025
TypeChannel
Username@blogsmalltalk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blogsmalltalk

Growth

2,3022,3062,3047 August 2026 — 2,306 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,305 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,302 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,301–2,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:172,302-3
8 Aug 2026, 11:282,305-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:032,306no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:162,306first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 02s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8828.4%
🔥7624.5%
❤‍🔥5818.7%
💯309.68%
😁185.81%
👏123.87%
custom 5208905352694736843113.55%
👎41.29%
🤗41.29%
😱20.645%
🤔20.645%
10.323%
🕊10.323%
🗿10.323%
🙏10.323%
🥰10.323%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 23 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2025, 14:57 UTC≈2,500 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍16🔥11❤‍🔥4💯3👎1👏1

29 Aug 2025, 14:53 UTC≈1,990 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍8🤗4custom 52089053526947368434😁1

29 Aug 2025, 14:52 UTC≈1,850 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @moodneppingVideo

💬 Mood 😊❤️

🔥11👍6❤‍🔥3🥰1

29 Aug 2025, 10:14 UTC≈1,540 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему ее до сих пор используют? Потому что для тяжелой, резистентной к лекарствам депрессии, кататонии или суицидального поведения — это часто самый быстрый и эффективный метод спасения жизни. Антидепрессанты могут действовать неделями, а человек в глубокой депрессии иногда не имеет и нескольких дней. ЭСТ может дать улучшение уже после нескольких сеансов. Механизм ее действия до конца не изучен, но считается, что

👍6🔥5

29 Aug 2025, 10:13 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шоковая терапия: путешествие в ад и обратно. Как от инсулиновой комы пришли к современной ЭСТ В истории психиатрии есть страницы, которые читать немного страшно. Они напоминают нам об отчаянных поисках врачей, которые, не имея современных инструментов, пытались любым способом вытащить пациентов из безумия. Сегодня мы поговорим об одном из самых неоднозначных методов — шоковой терапии. Путь от смертельно опасной инсу

🔥5👍3🤔2😱2

29 Aug 2025, 10:12 UTC883 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍8🔥8❤‍🔥3👎3🕊1

29 Aug 2025, 10:11 UTC878 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какая фраза из детства (от родителей, учителей, значимых взрослых) до сих пор иногда "звучит" у вас в голове и влияет на ваши решения или самоощущение?

  1. Критикующая/обесценивающая("Ты ничего не можешь сделать нормально!", "Ну и что ты опять учудил?")27%
  2. Тревожная / Гиперопекающая ("Оденься теплее, а то заболеешь!", "Будь осторожен, мир опасен!")20%
  3. Ожидающая успеха / Давящая ("Ты должен быть лучшим!", "Мы на тебя надеемся")9%
  4. Поддерживающая / Ресурсная ("У тебя все получится!", "Мы любим тебя любым")6%
  5. Практичная / Наставляющая ("Сначала дело – потом гуляй", "Думай головой")39%
  6. Другое15%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5

29 Aug 2025, 10:08 UTC815 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍9❤‍🔥5

28 Aug 2025, 10:05 UTC927 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Правда жизни.

🔥11👏5👍21

28 Aug 2025, 07:56 UTC877 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Страх перед успехом: привет, прокрастинация, прощай, успех Каждый из нас должен сам определять, что такое для него «успех». Для некоторых успех измеряется такими социальными стандартами, как профессиональный статус, финансовая стабильность или личная власть. Для других успех в большей степени предполагает достижения в отношениях, например в любви или семейной жизни. Внутреннее переживание успеха может выражаться в

👍7🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blogsmalltalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2025, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

Какая фраза из детства (от родителей, учителей, значимых взрослых) до сих пор иногда "звучит" у вас в голове и влияет на ваши решения или самоощущение?

  1. Критикующая/обесценивающая("Ты ничего не можешь сделать нормально!", "Ну и что ты опять учудил?")27%
  2. Тревожная / Гиперопекающая ("Оденься теплее, а то заболеешь!", "Будь осторожен, мир опасен!")20%
  3. Ожидающая успеха / Давящая ("Ты должен быть лучшим!", "Мы на тебя надеемся")9%
  4. Поддерживающая / Ресурсная ("У тебя все получится!", "Мы любим тебя любым")6%
  5. Практичная / Наставляющая ("Сначала дело – потом гуляй", "Думай головой")39%
  6. Другое15%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 23 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психотерапевт-онлайн” (@blogsmalltalk), 2,302 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blogsmalltalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.