Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

独立博客全订阅

@blogrsslist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,844subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496555688
TypeChannel
Username@blogrsslist
CreatedBetween 1 June 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blogrsslist

Growth

1,8441,8491,846.56 August 2026 — 1,849 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,849 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,847 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,844 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,843–1,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:361,844-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:381,847-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:241,849no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:451,849first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8751.8%
3822.6%
😁1911.3%
💯105.95%
👏42.38%
🥰42.38%
👎21.19%
😍21.19%
🎉10.595%
🤔10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2022 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jan 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @savewebPhoto

xLog 的各种 API、以及链上的 RPC、以及数据导出网站 export.crossbell.io 都已经废了。 刚糊了个 xLog 博文导出工具 https://xlog-takeout.saveweb.org/ 出来。 整个 xLog 的博文去掉大部分 spam 后也才 34k,很小。懒得写后端,直接前端加载 300MiB 的全量 sqlite (gzip 后 100MiB)。 xlog 受害者们尽快导出吧(IPFS 上的图片附件已经没了大半了)。

12 Jan 2025, 11:45 UTC≈3,050 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @saveweb

姐妹们!我又来啦!上次给大家安利的宝藏搜索引擎「丑搜」竟然又双叒叕更新啦!速度也太快了吧!简直是光速迭代! >>> https://search.save-web.org/ <<< 之前就超爱用「丑搜」翻看各种小众又宝藏的博客文章,这次更新更是让我直呼OMG! 它收录了十几万篇中文独立博客文章,1.7k+独立博客(还有少量播客哦!),简直是内容爱好者的天堂! 这次v3版本简直是史诗级更新! 让我来给姐妹们划重点: - 博客数量up up! 之前就有一千多个博客了,这次直接飙升到1.7k+博客、17w+博文!又有更多宝藏内容可以挖掘啦! 姐妹们再也不用担心找不到新鲜好文章看啦! - 时间排序OK啦! 以前是按匹配度排序,虽然能找到最相关的文章,但有时候也想看看最近更新的嘛!现在可以按时间排序啦!同时,之前是手动月更,现在会每日更新!想看最新的博文?安排!✅ - 高级搜索也安排上啦! 以前只能简单搜关键词,现在可以写 que

8😍2

28 Sept 2024, 14:39 UTC≈4,040 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#V20240928 > 年更 OPML 来了 总订阅源数:1908 发布时在线的博客数量:1336 发布时离线的博客数量:311+53+61 https://github.com/saveweb/rss-list/releases/tag/V20240928

👍12💯52

17 Feb 2024, 04:23 UTC≈5,900 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @saveweb

#丑搜 #搜索引擎 #博客 > 什么,你不知道“丑搜”?这是一个索引了 133k+ 篇中文独立博客文章的搜索引擎。🤗 由于半年前的一次服务器存储告急,为了腾空间就把丑搜的全文索引数据库删了。于是丑搜宕了快半年了……咕咕咕。 昨天重写了后端以及工作流,又捡起 @jsun969 去年给丑搜写的“新”前端,改进了下让它再次上线,现在它不丑了.jpg。或许不能再叫它丑搜了。 https://search.saveweb.org * 加了查看快照的功能 * 可以实时更新数据库索引了(暂时目前还没启用) * 可按文章发布时间排序(前端还未实现) * [NOTE]: 新前端还没做打字机模式 原丑搜还留着,目前充当 API: https://search-api.saveweb.org

6👍6💯5

31 Dec 2023, 16:20 UTC≈5,710 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @savewebPhoto

在 2023 年的最后一天,发了年终总结的博客们! 真的出现了现在才发 2022 年终总结的神人! (UTC+8; 混入了少数非年终总结的博文)

9🥰4👍2

5 Dec 2023, 14:53 UTC≈5,310 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

发条消息证明这个频道没被忘。 = = uglysearch 暂时关站,农历春节前重开。

👍22👏2

9 Sept 2023, 07:45 UTC≈6,740 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

# V20230809 > 年更 OPML 来了…… 订阅源数:1567 https://github.com/saveweb/rss-list/releases/tag/V20230809

👍52

Signed yzqzss | 一座桥在水上

24 Apr 2023, 10:51 UTC≈7,270 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @savewebPhoto

低质量的「独立博客」的判断方式、「独立博客」的判断、博客的分类、博客的特点(草稿) > 一点关于博客的探究。 原本 (2022-07-01) 我们开始写这个东西,还专门找了些古老的书和资料。但是此后就一直咕咕咕。文档已经吃灰几个月啦! 文档里主要是当时我们的一些讨论记录(有趣的讨论都在 Q&A 里)。”什么是「独立」“ 这一章基本没有问题了,然后其他全是还需要扩写和考证的内容……咕咕咕中…… 欢迎留言讨论。

👍91

Signed yzqzss |一座桥在水上

27 Mar 2023, 12:42 UTC≈5,940 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://uglysearch.othing.xyz 刚糊出来的中文独立博客搜索引擎。11万篇文章,1.4k+独立博客。(文章全文搜索) (没有搜索按钮,打字就行) demo 性质,不保可用性。

👍152🎉1

Signed yzqzss |一座桥在水上

6 Mar 2023, 04:55 UTC≈5,930 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yzqzss_note

今天测试了 https://github.com/saveweb/review-2021 的 197 篇文章,统计出中文独立博客的“文章URL腐烂率”,以下是结果: 总计:196篇 404:13 托管服务未续费:1 域名无解析/域名过期/ping不通:10 ssl过期:1 其中,有约一半的404是博客换了永久链接,但没做重定向。这仍然属于链接腐烂。 计算得,中文独立博客的文章链接年度腐烂率为:10~12%。半衰期为6年左右。

8👏2👍1👎1🤔1

Signed yzqzss |一座桥在水上

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @blogrsslist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,127,120 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“独立博客全订阅” (@blogrsslist), 1,844 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blogrsslist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.