Те 3 человека, кто всегда пишет мне комментарии и ставит реакции, знайте , вас ждут в гости на Красной Поляне 💔💔
❤326🔥42🥰11

Channel
@blogbrain_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,233subscribers
-190 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001162379759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blogbrain_tg |
| Description | Здесь становятся UGC-креаторами, которых выбирают бренды. РКН: https://rknn.link/hWD PR @alexbrain_pr Инст https://www.instagram.com/alex_brain |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blogbrain_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 58,233 | -33 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 58,266 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 58,288 | -37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 58,325 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 58,351 | -32 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 58,383 | -27 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 58,410 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 58,423 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (14 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 60,360 |
| Reactions total | 1,642 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,045 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,257 | 61.5% | |
| 🔥 | 461 | 22.5% | |
| 🦄 | 184 | 9.00% | |
| 😍 | 56 | 2.74% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 1.08% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 1.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 0.636% | |
| 🤪 | 11 | 0.538% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.391% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.147% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.147% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.098% | |
| 😴 | 2 | 0.098% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.049% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.049% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,045reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Те 3 человека, кто всегда пишет мне комментарии и ставит реакции, знайте , вас ждут в гости на Красной Поляне 💔💔
❤326🔥42🥰11
‼️ ИЩУ 50 ДЕВУШЕК, КОТОРЫМ ЕЩЁ НИ РАЗУ НЕ ПЛАТИЛИ ЗА КОНТЕНТ Даже если у вас 200 подписчиков. Даже если вы никогда не работали с брендами. Даже если пока вообще не понимаете, с чего начать. 💸Я в этой сфере уже 9 лет и всё, что я имею, заработала именно на контенте. И я покажу вам, как сделать то же самое. После запрета на рекламу рынок очень изменился. 🍋 Сегодня девушки с 200 подписчиками могут зарабатывать на ко…
❤46🔥11🗿2😍2
Просто взять и за неделю переехать жить в место мечты, потому что мы так захотели Денис сказал что я вхожу в топ 1% людей в мире, которые живут жизнь мечты и так обожают свою работу. Добро пожаловать в Красную Поляну!!! Семья!! Как вам наш вид с балкона?)
❤192🔥62🥰11
Шок!! Мы это сделали !! 🔥
🔥158😍35🤪11🦄4
Ладно, давайте я наконец нормально расскажу, как это вообще работает 😁 Если у вас есть телефон и вам хотелось бы получать подарки и оплаты от брендов, даже если у вас 300 подписчиков или вообще нет блога, вам сюда. Потому что я поняла по комментариям, что многие до сих пор думают, что бренды работают только с блогерами, но с 1 сентября рекламу запретили и все изменилось И теперь я сама 80% контента для брендов даж…
❤25👍5😴2
Вот фраза «80% даже к себе не выкладываю» для меня здесь интереснее бриллиантов😄 Получается, можно вообще не быть блогером в привычном понимании, но годами зарабатывать именно созданием контента для брендов? Вот про эту кухню очень хочется подробнее))
🔥23❤8💯1
Ну что, срочно смотрим 😍 Взяла бриллиантовую подвеску «А» И еще такой микродермал Красиво? Вы выбирали 😍 Кому скажи что я работаю за бриллианты - не поверят 🤣 Причём это UGC контент, не реклама в блоге, я 80% из-за того что снимаю даже к себе не выкладываю, а снимаю для брендов Давайте сделку, вы мне 100🦄, а я вам расскажу как это работает даже без блога! 9 лет всетаки снимаю контент для брендов) я не знаю есть …
🦄180❤17❤🔥5🔥5😱1
💎 оплата бриллиантами , как вам такое 😁 Срочно требуется помощь женская Так мне за UGC съемку оплатила одна очень крупная компания , а я не знаю что выбрать 🤣 Девочки, что из этого взять ? Варианты : 1. Подвеска буква А 2. Кольцо двойное 3. Подвеска камушек на шею 🥹🥹🥹 жду ваш вариант в комментариях, а то мне надо срочно сегодня выбрать !
🔥52❤15❤🔥8😁1
…мы хотим уехать из Москвы. Сама сейчас перечитала эту фразу и до сих пор не могу в неё поверить. Я никогда не думала, что скажу такое. Потому что Москва всегда была для меня городом мечты. Где всё происходит. Где жизнь кипит. Где кажется, что если ты не здесь -то точно что-то упускаешь. Но… Мне надоела эта гонка.. Хочется совсем другого💔 Утром делать свой любимый кофе, открывать окна и видеть горы или лес. Х…
❤118🔥19
Сидела женина скучала .. и решила переезжать 😭😭😭😭 Надоела Москва, представьте! Хочу спокойствия и наслаждения Какое место в России вы считаете самым классным? Куда бы переехали? Поделитесь своими мыслями плиз !!!
❤66
Кто спрашивал про мою подушку молодости - скорее смотрите сюда. Я уже почти месяц сплю на подушке Omnia от Beauty Sleep и специально сделала такой коллаж, потому что словами это не объяснить. На первой фотографии лицо буквально сминается, кожа собирается в складки. На второй - совсем другая картина. Представьте, сколько таких заломов мы сами создаём себе каждую ночь?! А со временем они могут превращаться в те самы…
🔥29❤14😁3
— Я вообще-то наряжалась не для тебя, а рилсик снять, — сказала я ему на нашей первой встрече ( помните эту историю ?)) В тот день я вообще ничего не планировала. Не собиралась влюбляться. Не думала, что это свидание изменит мою жизнь. И уж точно не ожидала, что человек, которого я вижу впервые, через несколько часов будет знать обо мне больше, чем многие за всю жизнь! И терпеть я не могу свидания, эти неловкие р…
❤119🔥13
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @blogbrain_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 359,825 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Саша Брайн ❤️” (@blogbrain_tg), 58,233 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blogbrain_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.