Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 65 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 583–608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 13:38
604
-1
1 Oct 2026, 17:19
605
+2
17 Sept 2026, 06:15
603
-1
8 Sept 2026, 07:58
604
+14
15 Aug 2026, 09:24
590
+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:19
586
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:14
586
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
327 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
48
14.7%
👍
39
11.9%
🔥
39
11.9%
🤝
38
11.6%
❤
35
10.7%
🙏
28
8.56%
🏆
17
5.20%
💯
16
4.89%
🫡
15
4.59%
😎
11
3.36%
⚡
10
3.06%
👏
9
2.75%
🍾
8
2.45%
❤🔥
7
2.14%
👌
7
2.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blog_sport_dohod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
➿➿➿➿➿
Взял небольшую паузу после ЧМ.
Отдых был просто необходим.
Побывали с женой в Суздале (Владимир) на очень крутом событии GRUT - простыми словами бег по лесам, полям, рекам, оврагам.
Супруга заняла второе место в своей возрастной категории - это шикарный результат 🎖️
Сертификат о финише и другие фото/видео в комментариях.
Кстати, в забеге участвовал Алексей Смертин - капитан сборной России, играл за Челси, ну…
➿➿➿➿➿
За тайм на двоих 3 удара в сторону ворот и 0.23 xG.
ФИФА это надоело и на следующем ЧМ при ничьей в финале не будет доп. времени и пенальти.
Финалисты останутся ни с чем, а кубок получит победитель матча за 3-ье место.
Таким образом, финалисты не будут катать вату, а матч за 3-ье место заиграет новыми красками и спора о его надобности больше не будет.
➿➿➿➿➿
➿➿➿➿➿
Аргентина на этом ЧМ получает 1 ЖК за каждые 22 фола, у Англии каждый 7-ой фол становится жёлтой карточкой.
Грубо говоря, если команды сфолят по 21 разу, то у Англии будет 3 ЖК, а у Аргентины - 0.
Конечно, я утрирую.
Но доля правды в этом есть.
Аргентина фолит аккуратнее и реже допускает ситуации, когда приходится срывать атаки соперника карточками.
➿➿➿➿➿
➿➿➿➿➿
Ямаль дважды играл против Франции и оба раза получал ЖК.
За пару часов до игры Ламин начал постить фото своих голов в ворота французов.
Какая-то странная и лишняя нервотрёпка для самого себя.
Думаю, Ямаль как обычно полезет в обыгрышь, потеряет мяч и будет вынужден срывать атаку соперника.
Также присмотрелся бы к карточкам Родри и Руиса, которым из-за высокой линии Испании придётся ловить быстрых французов в…
➿➿➿➿➿
За полчаса до старта ЧМ наткнулся на сайт, где можно расставлять команды в группах по местам, а потом выбирать кто будет проходить дальше в каждой стадии плейофф.
Таким образом, можно сложить свою итоговую картину всего ЧМ.
Я занялся этим сам и предложил тоже самое сделать сыну.
В итоге у нас у обоих финал получился Франция - Англия.
Я подумал, что это знак и поставил нам на двоих ставку:
В финале сыграют Фран…
➿➿➿➿➿
Пао - более опытная плей-оффная команда.
Финал четырёх пройдёт в Афинах.
Пао не имеет права пропустить домашний Ф4.
Во всех матчах этой серии итоговая разница была не более 4 очков.
Сегодня снова ожидаю зарубу.
Вряд ли одна из команд сможет сильно оторваться по счёту.
Думаю шансы на победу 50% на 50%.
Даже если Пао проиграет, остаются реальные шансы на заход форы.
➿➿➿➿➿
➿➿➿➿➿
ЭКСПРЕСС = 1,86
По Халлу имеем +9/-1.
По Миллуоллу +8/-1.
Личные встречи текущего сезона 4 и 4 гола.
В последних 7 матчах Факела подряд было 2 и более гола.
В последних 10 играх СКА подряд было 2 и более забитых мяча.
❌❌❌
➿➿➿➿➿
🤝5❤3🫡2💯1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blog_sport_dohod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог Каппера (S•D)” (@blog_sport_dohod), 604 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blog_sport_dohod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
