Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блог—Инженера™ | Охрана труда

Channel

Блог—Инженера™ | Охрана труда

@blog_inzhenera

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,960subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001369877582
TypeChannel
Username@blog_inzhenera
DescriptionС утра и навсегда — охрана труда! Наш сайт: https://блог-инженера.рф Наш форум: https://vo.spec.help Наш проект «Лица» https://vlica.ru Канал включён в перечень РКН https://bif.one/LEitaT4
Created28 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/blog_inzhenera

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,96018,03717,998.56 August 2026 — 18,035 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,037 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,032 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,027 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,023 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,024 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,023 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,024 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,017 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,015 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,014 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,018 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,016 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,019 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,023 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,020 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,019 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,017 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,019 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,022 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,020 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,018 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,014 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,012 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,010 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,012 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,009 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,006 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,011 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,000 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,993 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,996 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,986 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,984 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,982 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,985 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,976 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,973 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,976 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,974 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,971 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,968 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,963 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,962 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,965 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,971 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,966 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,963 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,967 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,971 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,974 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,975 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,970 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,967 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,965 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,967 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,964 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,962 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,960 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,948–18,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:2517,960-2
5 Nov 2026, 20:4417,962-2
4 Nov 2026, 22:4817,964-3
3 Nov 2026, 01:2717,967+2
1 Nov 2026, 21:5917,965-2
31 Oct 2026, 18:2717,967-3
30 Oct 2026, 21:2817,970-5
29 Oct 2026, 22:1517,975+1
28 Oct 2026, 23:3717,974+3
27 Oct 2026, 19:0917,971+4
26 Oct 2026, 20:5717,967+4
25 Oct 2026, 21:2817,963-3
24 Oct 2026, 23:0917,966-5
23 Oct 2026, 23:0617,971+6
23 Oct 2026, 00:3717,965+3
20 Oct 2026, 18:2617,962-1
19 Oct 2026, 18:1717,963-5
18 Oct 2026, 17:5117,968-3
17 Oct 2026, 16:4617,971-3
16 Oct 2026, 15:0417,974first reading

Engagement

193 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.71%
avg views ÷ 17,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 193 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held193 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total35,863
Reactions total629
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 03:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,170
Videos
≈669
Links
≈6,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 56s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,519 reactions across 192 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540237947746232720863518.0%
👍61117.4%
❤46513.2%
🔥45212.8%
🤣2607.39%
⚡2396.79%
😱1734.92%
😁962.73%
👀952.70%
🤔892.53%
👨‍💻691.96%
🤬551.56%
💯411.17%
🤯371.05%
🤝340.966%
👏300.853%
🗿290.824%
🥴250.71%
😢170.483%
👾160.455%
10 further kinds511.45%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 192 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blog_inzhenera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 193 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.07%
4 of 193 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
949
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,090
over 188 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqVGZCmpB2M4AEyij7sCsZX6Ce2C52XCNdE43k117 August 202617 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqVGZCmpCdZqAmwuPH3fRxBodWmTPbYhaRLwmS11 September 20261 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqVGZCmpDiekQsNu7X73iTtwS33Gma5zNk9q2m11 September 20261 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqVGZCmpFP5jTDNexbTxcdcmq8FDa9pEdGFNXL111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC402 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ВНИМАНИЕ! Читайте договоры с учебными центрами! Наша подписчица (СОТ) на новом месте работы пошла учиться в УЦ – логично, правильно, все так делают. Но СОТ – не юрист, да и не ожидала она такого подвоха от УЦ, ведь о подобных махинациях мы ещё не слышали: 🔴Теоретическая часть программы реализуется ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЕМ с применением дистанционных технологий. 📱ЗАКАЗЧИК обязуется организовать очное прохождение практической ч…

🤔6👀3custom 54023794774623272083❤1👍1🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC556 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Новый профстандарт по пожарной безопасности: что изменится для специалистов? ✅ «Разбираемся, какие требования предъявляются к квалификации, знаниям и обязанностям специалистов по пожарной безопасности и на что стоит обратить внимание работодателям» ➡️ Смотреть Автор: centrfenix #centrfenix

❤4👀3🔥3👍2

6 Nov 2026, 10:31 UTC654 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

СОУТ на вакантном рабочем месте не запрещена Можно ли проводить спецоценку, если должность в штатном расписании есть, а работника на ней нет? Разобрались в нюансах законодательства, признаках «штатности» производственного процесса и алгоритме действий для комиссии, когда сроки проведения СОУТ уже поджимают. Содержание: 📱Что такое вакантное рабочее место? 📱На каких рабочих местах не проводится СОУТ? 📱Когда производс…

❤6👍3🔥2

6 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC698 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кто поддержит специалиста по ОТ, если руководитель не слышит? ✅ «Спецодежда линяет, садится и расползается, специалист по охране труда сообщает руководителю, но замены добиться не может. А объясняться с работниками приходится ему. Так описывал свою ситуацию Александр в комментариях к статье «Что не так с сообществом специалистов по охране труда?» на «Блог—Инженера». Он признавался, что после этого стыдно смотреть лю…

👍6custom 54023794774623272083❤1🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC771 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Для электросамокатов и электромопедов обновят ПДД Минтранс разместил на общественное обсуждение проект изменений в Правила дорожного движения, касающийся передвижения средств индивидуальной мобильности (СИМ). Среди предложений: 📱разграничить СИМ и другие устройства: к первым отнесут электросамокаты и электровелосипеды мощностью до 250 Вт и скоростью до 25 км/ч. Если мощность устройства выше (чаще всего такие испол…

👍9❤3🔥3🤝1

5 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC858 views19 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кодекс этики для инженеров противопожарной защиты ✅ «Пока я нахожусь в творческом кризисе (а на самом деле в куче работ и забот), предлагаю поэтапно ознакомиться с Кодексом этики пожарных специалистов сообщества пожарных инженеров и обсудить его в комментариях» Содержание: 📱Раздел I. Преамбула 📱Раздел II. Основные принципы 📱Личный взгляд Читать https://go.vlica.ru/LKvueI7 Автор: Константин Прокшиц #prokshits

❤8👍4🔥4👀3

5 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC904 views39 reactionsread 7 November 2026

📱 Рубрика «Цена ошибки»: планёрки во внеурочное время Начальник службы промбезопасности ежедневно с 7:30 до 9:00 участвовал в селекторных совещаниях, хотя по трудовому договору его рабочий день начинался только в 9:00. Так происходило с понедельника по субботу. После увольнения сотрудник обратился в суд и потребовал оплатить сверхурочную работу более чем за два года. Работодатель возражал: письменных приказов о пе…

❤14🤬12👍7custom 54023794774623272084🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC870 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Электронные медкнижки: переход снова откладывается! ✅ «Срок перехода на электронные медицинские книжки продлили до 1 сентября 2027 года. Что это значит для работодателей и можно ли пока использовать бумажные медкнижки?» ➡️ Смотреть Автор: centrfenix #centrfenix

❤5👍3🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC958 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Обучение — в учебном центре, проверка знаний — у работодателя: Роструд разрешил ✅ «Роструд подтвердил: после обучения по программе 46Б в аккредитованном учебном центре проверку знаний может провести комиссия работодателя» Содержание: 📱Что позволяет ПП № 2464 📱А потом появляется реестр 📱Есть ещё одна маленькая юридическая закорючка 📱Значит, так делать нельзя? 📱Что делать работодателю сейчас Читать https://go.vlica.…

❤8👍6🔥3👏1

4 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,220 views57 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Студия Артемия Лебедева подготовила плакат ко Дню народного единства, который на самом деле объединяет всех нас С праздником! Блог—Инженера для людей ❤️

😁27custom 54023794774623272089💯8🤣4❤3👏3🙈2🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,210 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

📱 Рубрика «Цена ошибки»: утечка газа В Государственную инспекцию труда в Республике Саха (Якутия) поступило извещение о групповом несчастном случае со смертельным исходом, произошедшем с работниками артели старателей. Как следует из направленного работодателем извещения, 27 июля 2026 года ориентировочно 22:15 при самовольном использовании (без наряд-задания) бытового газового баллона (50 л) в токарном цеху, произо…

👍9custom 54023794774623272084🔥3❤1

3 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,100 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026

📱 НОВОСТИ 📱 Дроны — «провизоры» появятся в России Утвердили ГОСТ по доставке медицинских грузов беспилотниками. Требования к вступят в силу 30 ноября. 📱Простая электронная подпись в протоколе проверки знаний по охране труда Будет ли простая электронная подпись, сформированная в системе электронного документооборота Учебного центра (без сайта Госуслуг), действительной для Госинспекции труда при подписании работнико…

🤔6❤3⚡2👍2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @blog_inzhenera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Охрана труда
@ohranatruda_official · 24,895
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Роструд
@rostrud_official · 26,138
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Ростехнадзор
@gosnadzorru · 27,754
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог—Инженера™ | Охрана труда” (@blog_inzhenera), 17,960 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blog_inzhenera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.