🔥КОЛИЧЕСТВО СОЖЖЕНЫХ НОВЫХ ПОДАРКОВ: 🎁 Mighty Arm 🔥burned : 877 шт (17.54% саплая сожжено) 🎁 Artisan Brick 🔥burned : 148 шт (2.11% саплая сожжено) 🎁 Input Key 🔥burned : 40 250 шт (20.12% саплая сожжено)

Channel
Блокчейн Стоика
@blockchain_stoic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002475847841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockchain_stoic |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 24 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockchain_stoic |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 20 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 8 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 12,400
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 12,400
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blockchain_stoic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2025 to 1 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣1
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡 Приближается минт стикеров Пополняем запасы☝️
🫡 Если ты хочешь уйти от страданий - не меняй место, меняй себя. Новая обстановка не спасет, пока ты носишь с собой старые привычки. 🪙 Луций Сенека
⚡3
💥 Идем дальше, если TON Скам, то какого лешего вы продолжаете сидеть в нем? Ответ простой, в TON зарабатывают и это делается гораздо проще чем в других блокчейнах. В связке телеграм это становится легче и доступнее. Повторюсь, зарабатывают те, кто умеет думать. Но эта легкость играет злую шутку, пользователи в TON реально обленились. Если раньше надо было ежедневно проявлять активность, заходить в десятки приложений,…
💎 Накипело! TON СКАМ, прогрели ГОЕВ и вот это ВСЕ!!! Друзья, хочу поделится своими мыслями по поводу того, что происходит в TON, отношение комьюнити и некоторых недалеких как они себя называют «инфлюенсеров». Для начала нужно понимать, что мы находимся на финансовом рынке, в который все пришли зарабатывать, а не раздавать на халяву деньги всем подряд. Очень много крипто каналов сейчас ведут дети Ноткоина и подарочны…
🫡 Не позволяй своему настроению диктовать что тебе делать. В любом случае, ты должен делать то, что должно дать сделано. ☝️
⚡1
🫡Подборка концептов на подарки Новая порция концептов от креативного директора: 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁
⚡2
#DeWork #SWGT #крипто На рынок вышла первая в мире децентрализованная фриланс биржа DeWork, с нулевой комиссией для фрилансеров и заказчиков на базе токена SWGT. Токен платформы был добавлен в индекс лист на сайте Bybit В ближайшее время ожидается листинг на tier-1 биржах на фоне запуска продукта. Сейчас токен доступен для покупок на биржах: Gate, Bitget, MEXC
Обратите внимание на шлема. 🎁 Саплай меньше чем у кепок Любимый фильм Дурова 300 спартанцев 🫡
⚡2
Копим стикеры. NFT 2.0 грядет 💪
🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @blockchain_stoic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блокчейн Стоика” (@blockchain_stoic), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchain_stoic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.