4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,110–1,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:15
1,111
+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:48
1,110
-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:30
1,111
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:20
1,111
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
832 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
156
18.8%
❤
139
16.7%
👻
137
16.5%
👍
120
14.4%
🔥
109
13.1%
🫡
95
11.4%
🤔
57
6.85%
🤯
7
0.841%
🤩
6
0.721%
🎉
3
0.361%
👏
3
0.361%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 832reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 19 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blockchain_spirit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2025 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤔 И еще хотел кое-что показать интересное…
🗣 Выше - график крупных взломов DEFI протоколов.
Есть еще статистика вообще всех взломов, включая мелкие:
🔗 Ссылка:
https://defillama.com/hacks?time=1y
Обратите внимание - практически каждый день что-то взламывают. С развитием ИИ найти уязвимость в протоколе - теперь дело 1 нажатия на кнопку.
🌚 Недавно находили уязвимость даже в ZEC, который работает, на минуточку, с ок…
📉 Давненько здесь не появлялся, и вот опять он за своё…
🐻 Моргнуть не успели, а мы уже практически на дне медвежки. Кто бы что ни говорил, а цикличность и её свойства всё еще управляет рынком.
Обратите внимание как снижается волатильность, как глобально стабилизируется рынок.
Закупаемся в октябре 2026, получается? 🫡
P.S. Скоро в этом канале активности станет чуть больше
♻️Обменник | 📈Биржа
Поздравляю вас с Новым годом, ребята! 🎅
Желаю вам бесконечного счастья и прекрасных подарков под ёлку! 🎄🎁
Да прибудет с вами дух блокчейна в 2026 году! 👻
Bitwise представили таблицу с динамикой BTC после того, как индекс "страха и жадности" падал ниже 20.
Bitwise: когда индекс "страха и жадности" в крипте падает ниже 20, вероятность динамики BTC резко меняется в сторону роста — и данные говорят сами за себя:
1 нед: +5,2%
2 нед: +9,3%
1 мес: +19,9%
2 мес.: +44,2%
3 мес.: +62,4%
6 месяцев: +48,5%
♻️Обменник | 📈Биржа
Интересные события разворачиваются - страх как будто дно медвежки, но по рынку как будто всего лишь коррекция.
Плюс ко всему сейчас конец цикла поидее, но жадности как не было, так и нет.
Стоим на пороге интересных событий - либо зона 90-93к рухнет, и мир погрузится в 3-летнюю медвежку, либо ждем слом цикличности и V-образный прайс рекавери.
Ниже 90к покупать - это ловить ножи против цикла. А вот сейчас полудить л…
🤖 Соревнование ИИ-моделей в трейдинге.
Забавно это наблюдать, но на самом деле мы так мизинчиком прикасаемся к будущему человечества.
🔗 Ссылка на онлайн статистику:
https://nof1.ai/
Там можно посмотреть какие позиции удерживают ИИ-модели в реальном времени, и как они поясняют свои действия.
♻️Обменник | 📈Биржа
🤫 Не думай.
В крипте вообще много думать опасно, потому что граница между трезвыми рассуждениями, опирающимися на реальность, и иллюзиями быстро размывается.
Все правила игры давно известны, но принять их почему-то дано не каждому - мы спим в миражах сомнений, которые не дают нам твердо опереться на асфальт происходящего.
🚀 Последний рывок, let’s go!
♻️Обменник | 📈Биржа
✏️ История подписчика:
"Ребят, по поводу обменников хотел написать - в прошлом месяце мне 300к руб выдали частями по 7-12к руб через бестчендж, без согласований каких-либо с моей стороны.
Я афигел конечно когда начали транзакции сыпаться.
Через пару недель банк хлопнул счет по 115 ФЗ. Пришлось доказывать дукоментально более 100 транзакций за месяц.
В итоге порешали - счет восстановили, но был шанс что по 115 ФЗ в…
👍23🤯6🫡6🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blockchain_spirit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 849,942 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@blockchain_spirit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bs_stream named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Руслан Масгутов @rusmasgutov · 145,264 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“👻 Blockchain Spirit” (@blockchain_spirit), 1,111 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchain_spirit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
