Channel
@blockchain_pot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002193752136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockchain_pot |
| Description | 🍵 чайный дом имени лудоса чат: @cryptoteachat_cis |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockchain_pot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 23 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 24 | 49.0% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 24.5% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 4.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я не знаю второго такого конченного маркетплейса, который бы по кругу заебывал меня капчей. за один день пользования гетгемсом я определял на картинке ведра, кресла, сумки и прочие предметы больше раз, чем за несколько лет на опенси че за дурка, кто это придумал вообще
❤5😁2
зашел в @wallet чтоб купить золото и закинуть его в стейкинг под 25% годовых заржал с того, что есть отдельная вкладка для крипты и отдельная для тона 😁
😁9
Я засажен в NFT фримена на $200 По факту из расходов у меня получается 66 TON (на тот момент около $114) на стикеры, которые я все сжег. Мне WL выдали заведомо в проигравшую команду, так что каких-то бонусов за сжигание не предвидится. Ну дали 6 WL на минт NFT на FCFS стадии. Еще один WL у меня был GTD. Итого на минт 7 NFT я потратил ~$22 + еще 4 NFT я откупил с маркета на $75. Опенси мне показывает, что мои 11 NFT…
🗿4
💀💀💀
❤1
Обменяю мой стендофф2 аккаунт на новый подарок (булавку), можно чтоб вы аккаунтом передали, + ваша доплата 200 тон (можно рублями на сберкидс)
Video, posted without a caption
😁4❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
бля сашк кучер чзх 15 тон отдам, а на плавную анимацию потом додеп еще делать надо будет?
😁3🎄1
- дорогой, когда у нас уже будет мемсизон на тоне? - у нас уже был мемсизон на тоне. помнишь альтушку, клоун, говно. вот это все - нет давай нормальный мем сизон - бля лан ща, подержи мое пиво ... ... *золотая виза оаэ за стейкинг TON*
❤1
сегодня лайфчейнджа снова не случилось спокойной ночи
❤🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
извините но это очень смешно
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blockchain_pot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“чайник блокчейности” (@blockchain_pot), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchain_pot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.