Channel
@blockbenchfreemodel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,691subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002238493917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockbenchfreemodel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockbenchfreemodel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,691 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 1,689 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 1,690 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 1,690 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 May 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,970 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
315 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 247 | 78.4% | |
| custom 5832636231590087941 | 60 | 19.0% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.54% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blockbenchfreemodel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вспомним старые добрые времена, когда еще я сас делал почти все модели для этого канала Пишите в комменты, что хотите увидеть следующим, самое интересное/максимально полезное сделаю(за рофлы мут на 30 мин) Буду ставить в реакциях циферки от 1 до 10, насколько вероятно я сделаю именно вашу модель
❤36
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Channel photo updated
Скины по плащам 🗂___скачать___ 🇩🇯Автор #скин
❤12
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Не законченно! Роботек 🗂___скачать___ 🇩🇯Автор #другое
❤23custom 58326362315900879414💔1
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
В качестве извинения за мое долгое отсутствие мои дорогие спермотоксикозники ловите 🗂___скачать___ Автора хз🤷♂️ #живое
❤36💔2
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Сегодня узнал о такой замечательной игре как 🔥Arsonate, и вот чета меня так пробило я хз Игра оч вайбовая и прикольная, а я впринципе настолки обожаю, так что сделал себе а4 листы со всеми картами(рисовал сам) Кому интересно правила в инете поищите 🗂___скачать___ #арт
❤16
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
хочу сделать себе небольшой вызов у меня вообще есть ютабчик(на который я тотали забил), и вот чтобы заполнить пустоту хочу сделать фнаф в багроке за неделю или меньше стоит ли вообще пробовать? естественно все что я там буду использовать выложу сюда👍
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
「 free model 」 pinned a photo
well well well... все готово, канал моделлеры(и не только) постят создан навсяк напомню что это: канал созданный для контентмейкеров разных мастей связанных с майном для набора стартовой и не только аудитории для простых людей же это просто сбор всего что связано с майном в одном месте а так же поиск потенциально интересных личностей бот для отправления заявок: @Modeller_post_bot
❤8💔1
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Стоит ли делать свой аналог постов скинмейкеров? Для тех кто не знает: это канал, в котором любой желающий может отправить свой пост со скином, а тк у меня канал с моделями, понятно что будет у меня
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3custom 58326362315900879412
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Сделал прайс лист для всех тех, кто спрашивал✌️
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Сигуритки 🗂___скачать___ 🇩🇯Автор #предмет
❤18
Signed 🇷🇺⎝ཌད⎠ㄩ乙乃Ҝ⎝ཌད⎠🇺🇿
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blockbenchfreemodel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
хочу сделать себе небольшой вызов у меня вообще есть ютабчик(на который я тотали забил), и вот чтобы заполнить пустоту хочу сделать фнаф в багроке за неделю или меньше стоит ли вообще пробовать? естественно все что я там буду использовать выложу сюда👍
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Стоит ли делать свой аналог постов скинмейкеров? Для тех кто не знает: это канал, в котором любой желающий может отправить свой пост со скином, а тк у меня канал с моделями, понятно что будет у меня
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,099,346 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“「 free model 」” (@blockbenchfreemodel), 1,691 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockbenchfreemodel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.