Blizzard Alphas LOBBY pinned a photo

Channel
Blizzard Alphas LOBBY
@blizzardcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,218subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002095124541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blizzardcalls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blizzardcalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 1,218 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 1,222 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,224 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 1,227 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 1,228 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 1,232 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,234 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,234 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 72.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 24.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Robin Hood chain volume is massive right now now we do insane multiples. 🚀 🔥Best way to trade all the coins is to use Based bot here: https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_BlizzAlterego
OG $ZION at 9K MC 8JAoMxhNwJbMPMHTtdUnHafUhr43rbF6odddfFFfzb3N
Aped some $AWIF at 4.5K MC because its basically free and its the OG one and ticker is fire 4x79dkB5JUwtZKZXhuXYMVppM2pHZTDvovZGy1hMQcSj
Blizzard Alphas LOBBY pinned «🔥 Been testing FOMO for the last few days and honestly it’s one of the cleaner crypto apps I’ve used. Really like being able to follow wallets, see trades in real time, and discover new runners without jumping between 10 different tools. If you haven’t checked…»
🔥 Been testing FOMO for the last few days and honestly it’s one of the cleaner crypto apps I’ve used. Really like being able to follow wallets, see trades in real time, and discover new runners without jumping between 10 different tools. If you haven’t checked it out yet, it’s worth a look. Sign up through my link and get 10% off trading fees: Trade with me on fomo and get 10% off fees! https://fomo.family/r/mart…
Aled some $Sazan island at 14K MC 9VVPW52RUomAPkPkZedErpqWzZbm2LPryjyowdMp4BuC Trading the news a bit
$HEAR at 6K MC on epic dip now 9p15uVAQMXZcUBvxbeHh4cj8oV62QFt6xbWCtxF1pump Its viral AI trend
$PLUSHIES at 9K MC J8V4s1DTguJKkUna27cya8ucrAqrXMkP138cCxRdpump Gamble DYOR
3.5x at 50K MC now! ⚡️🤝
2.5x at 35K MC just bonded
$AI at 14K MC DTtLv49sdWZ95LesdR7Z65urGQ4hVutiQV3i6phnpump Meme creator is on board, meme itself 2M views in 24 hours!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blizzardcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 734,450 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blizzard Alphas LOBBY” (@blizzardcalls), 1,218 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blizzardcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.