Мы не умрем. Мы останемся эхом.
Авторский канал для души, мыслей и творчества, а так же моделизм и все, что с ним связано.
Осторожно! В основном щитпостинг.
https://t.me/+LKxzL-AuAd44MTEy - чат для вопросов и просто потрепать языком.
TID:9029581328
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 04:16
30
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:53
30
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.9
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
15 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
238
Reactions total
37
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈254
Links
≈67
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🍓
9
24.3%
custom 5239994258718492799
8
21.6%
custom 5247227563465532448
7
18.9%
custom 5274264734781168853
6
16.2%
custom 5404708066996279258
6
16.2%
custom 5337188496748601166
1
2.70%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Моё представление о Дружбе всегда было чем то глубоким, чувственным и сакрализированным. Я не понимал, как кто-то может иметь много друзей, потому что смотрел через свою призму «если и дружба - то только настоящая».
Вообще, если взять условную традицию Скифов, то там, если у Мужчины было более трех друзей (прочных союзов дружбы «побратимств»), то такой Мужчина сравнивался с распутной женщиной, которая точно также до…
Канал уходит в неактив на неопределенное время.
Буду думать насчет контента, его качества и вектора направления.
Все кто был с каналом - легенды. Каждому крепко жму руку.
Можете оставаться, можете отписаться, решать только вам, в скором времени вернусь с новым форматом и идеями. Не хочу чтобы канал просто напросто находился в режиме тишины и вы не понимали почему так.
Всех обнял, на связи главный админ.
В очередной раз, руководство Московского Спартака положило хуй на своих фанатов.
В этот раз, не смотря на все протесты, в команду был приобретен албанец. И не просто албанец, а мерзкий пидор, который яростно топит за шиптарскую армию (о чём свидетельствуют его тату) и не скрывает своей неприязни к братскому для нас народу Сербии.
Получается ради гипотетических каких-то результатов, руководство клуба готово в открытую…
6 августа 1915 года состоялась оборона Осовецкой крепости.
Этот эпизод Первой мировой войны известен также, как "Атака мертвецов".
На рассвете начался выпуск хлора и брома германскими войсками.
Немцы уверенно шли вперед, никак не ожидая встретить яростного сопротивления, так как были уверены, что весь гарнизон крепости был отравлен.
Но наши войска внезапно перешли в контрнаступление и неприятель в ужасе бежал, оста…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @blindagemod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эхо Ереси” (@blindagemod), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blindagemod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
