Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BLIND

@blind_conf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

238subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003174137970
TypeChannel
Username@blind_conf
Created28 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blind_conf

Growth

238239238.510 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 239 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:30 — 239 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:08 — 238 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:1710 Aug 2026, 18:08
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 238–239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:08238-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:30239no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:17239first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 3 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54609914015022058013727.8%
custom 53751884947778951252418.0%
custom 54608133665178531821511.3%
custom 5314672959628012885139.77%
custom 5314628888968588021129.02%
custom 5418353414318880210129.02%
custom 541793984332801164696.77%
custom 538449842480247324264.51%
custom 531435380060824826953.76%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2025 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 20:52 UTC≈1,990 views57 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дарова это камбэк БЛАЙНДА, ставьте инициалы, подавайте заявки в чат😁 все разбанены поставьте реакции на посты и подкиньте бустов

custom 546099140150220580117custom 546081336651785318215custom 537518849477789512513custom 53146288889685880216custom 53143538006082482693custom 53844984248024732423

12 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,980 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 546099140150220580110custom 54179398433280116469custom 53751884947778951258custom 53146729596280128857custom 54183534143188802107

12 Jun 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,620 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🎁ŴE.ŁCO#ME ɼυles 🐲🐲 ĂDM..STAFF?⚠️ ☀️ İ¿?ŞEE(see) 🧡 ďeād рⷬⷬⷬEͤoͦрⷬⷬⷬłeͤ* PATENT ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ .. 𑀡ηʝʈʝαɭʂ & ##UNIœn🌟 ϺΟƝ$ͲξRS

custom 546099140150220580110custom 53146288889685880216custom 53146729596280128856custom 54183534143188802105custom 53751884947778951253custom 53844984248024732423custom 53143538006082482692

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @blind_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 216,957 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BLIND” (@blind_conf), 238 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blind_conf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.