Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАКРЫТЫ || Ᏼlᴇnd flᴏᴏd `🎴

@blend_flood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002788922559
TypeChannel
Username@blend_flood
Description|Флуд по кпоп и дорамам |открытие : 05.07.25 |оформление : @sbetis |тик ток : @blend__flood
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/blend_flood

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1613no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:1413first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
62
Videos
34
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭685.7%
114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 7 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2025, 13:58 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «ЗАКРЫТЫ || Ᏼlᴇnd flᴏᴏd `🎴»

7 Oct 2025, 13:53 UTC204 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы закрываемся Вот так вот получилось ,честно даже не знаю как объяснить из за чего ,но скажу что этот флуд был самым важным для меня ,за всю жизнь .На днях вышел Влд ,поэтому я стала им ,и это действительно сложно ,и скажем так трудно ,но все же как бы не было трудно ,одновременно было и весело,и комфортно, всех люблю !!Люблю все свои союзы ,особенно KsKsflood,лбблю ,обожаю всех своих участников ,так и нынешних ,та

😭6

6 Oct 2025, 16:35 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @EVIOLAIINFOPhoto

доброе утро. пора просыпаться. надеюсь вы выспались и проснулись с хорошим настроением, ведь наш канал готов делать сзрп. Надеюсь на актив с вашей стороны,посты скоро начнутся. Сзрп; доброе утро

6 Oct 2025, 16:34 UTC37 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

ещё есть вариант сделать в стиле японии, хотите? sxrp

  1. додододо96%
  2. не4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2025, 15:54 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Хочу сделать нью эру,идей нет.Помогите. sxrp

  1. розовая7%
  2. кофейная41%
  3. черная7%
  4. голубая21%
  5. радужная (хз как делать)24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2025, 13:03 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026

2️⃣➖1️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ Чучуть любимые! #ks_ksrp

5 Oct 2025, 04:58 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ImTruestKimGaeul

6>>130. пжж. сзрп. ( щас отписки пойдут).

5 Oct 2025, 04:53 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @EVIOLAIINFOPhoto

🔥🔥🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥 🟡 date: 04.10.25 Idea: not our by: lee know ✔️ Reactions + #Evirp

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blend_flood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Oct 2025, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

ещё есть вариант сделать в стиле японии, хотите? sxrp

  1. додододо96%
  2. не4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2025, 15:54 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Хочу сделать нью эру,идей нет.Помогите. sxrp

  1. розовая7%
  2. кофейная41%
  3. черная7%
  4. голубая21%
  5. радужная (хз как делать)24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 7 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАКРЫТЫ || Ᏼlᴇnd flᴏᴏd `🎴” (@blend_flood), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blend_flood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.