je laisse simplement cela ici
💘8🌚4

Channel
@blanchetalks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003948636199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blanchetalks |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 11 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blanchetalks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 35 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 35 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
126 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 79 | 62.7% | |
| 🌚 | 47 | 37.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blanchetalks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
je laisse simplement cela ici
💘8🌚4
depuis que j’etais enfant, il y avait une tradition de mariage qui me faisait rever plus que toutes les autres. le lancer du bouquet. je m’imaginais toujours a la place de la mariee, en me demandant quelles fleurs je choisirais, a quoi ressemblerait mon bouquet et a quel moment je le lancerais. lorsque tom m’a demandee en mariage, je crois que j’ai commence a imaginer ce bouquet presque avant le reste de la ceremon…
💘7🌚4
«l’amour n’a pas besoin d’etre parfait, il doit seulement etre vrai.» aujourd’hui, je suis devenue madame riddle. je crois que certains destins s’ecrivent bien avant notre naissance. parfois, ils nous font attendre, parfois ils nous brisent un peu, juste assez pour que nous comprenions enfin la valeur de ce qui nous etait promis. aujourd’hui, nous nous sommes maries. nous avons uni nos vies, nos promesses et nos a…
💘8🌚5
merci à mes merveilleuses filles pour cet enterrement de vie de jeune fille inoubliable. je suis infiniment touchée que vous ayez partagé cette journée avec moi. votre présence, votre amour et votre amitié comptent plus que les mots ne pourront jamais l’exprimer. vous m’êtes si chères, et je garderai ces souvenirs dans mon coeur pour toujours. ♡ ma trésor🤍 mon chaton🤍 ma perle🤍 mon amour🤍 ma belle🤍 ME & MY GIRLS
💘9🌚6
une belle soirée avec la merveilleuse sophia ME & MY GIRL🤍
💘4
мы очень устали, но: объездили четыре свадебных салона в поисках идеального платья; приготовили вместе печенье не разбудив маттео и софи; поругались из-за рецепта печенья; помирились пока играли в шахматы; легли спать и зачитались до рассвета ❝aimer, ce n’est pas se regarder l’un l’autre, c’est regarder ensemble dans la mêmе direction❞ — Antoine de Saint-Exupéry ME &…
💘12🌚9
ME & MY FAM
🌚5💘5
nice 🤩 nice a quelque chose de magique. les journées passent lentement entre le bruit des vagues et la chaleur du soleil, mais avec toi, elles passent toujours trop vite. j’aime marcher à tes côtés le long de la mer, sentir le vent salé dans mes cheveux et oublier le reste du monde pendant quelques heures. si le bonheur ressemble à quelque chose, alors il ressemble probablement à un coucher de soleil sur la côte, …
💘7🌚3
😽 à bientôt, paris. nous reviendrons dans quelques jours.. pan merlin, le mariage approche à grands pas!! :0 [ до встречи, париж, мы вернемся через несколько дней.. мерлин, свадьба уже совсем скоро!! :0 ] ME & TOM 🖖
💘6🌚4
je l’ai dit, oui!! 🤩 [я сказала да!!!] je ne t’en veux plus, mais on aurait pu faire ça directement dès le début. [я больше на тебя не обижаюсь, но можно было сделать это сразу, с самого начала.] ME & TOM
💘7🌚4
je ne sais plus à quel moment tu es devenu une partie de moi. peut-être que cela n’a jamais été de l’amour ordinaire. c’était quelque chose de plus dangereux, de plus profond. une dépendance douce dont je ne voulais pas me libérer. et le plus étrange, c’est que tu ressens la même chose. nous nous attirons comme deux flammes qui savent qu’elles finiront par tout brûler autour d’elles. nous connaissons les conséquences…
💘6🌚3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @blanchetalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 98,974 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blanchetalks named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°。⋆ ʜᴇʏ, ᴍᴏɴɪ.. ☽” (@blanchetalks), 35 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blanchetalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.