Channel
@blaineisapain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,235subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001474606982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blaineisapain |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blaineisapain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,235 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 1,236 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 1,236 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
610 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 219 | 35.9% | |
| 👍 | 96 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 75 | 12.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 58 | 9.51% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 5.25% | |
| 🤔 | 31 | 5.08% | |
| 🤝 | 27 | 4.43% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 4.10% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 2.13% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.15% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.492% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.328% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.164% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.164% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.164% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.164% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.328% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 610reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тебе спасибо за смелость. Чтобы сказать такое, нужно решиться и я знаю, как это иногда не просто. Я рад, что смог так повлиять на кого-то и сделать что-то хорошее. Это дается большой ценой, и цена эта, к сожалению, исчисляется вовсе не в деньгами. Я рад и ценю, и благодарен за эти слова. На здоровье) P.S. сказал бы чуть искреннее, но меня стесняют рамки, к сожалению.
❤🔥25🔥13❤10👏3💯2
Михаил Шетько - Объятия Лучезарного. А, если серьезно, Дорожные работы Стивен Кинга.
❤15👍4😁1
Если ты про микробиолога, то нет, не читал.
Мне откровенно скучно и я решил сделать то, что делают 20-ти летние девочки у себя на страничках. Кароче, вот вам. Отвечать, конечно, буду не на все, но вдруг будут интересные вопросы. t.me/voprosy?start=vkulfht
❤1
Его лучшая разводка состояла в том, что он заставил тебя поверить, что он — это ты…
🔥5❤2
Слышали когда-нибудь такое слово "Эмпатия"? Какие только формулировки и трактовки этого термина не приходилось встречать. От кого я только не слышал фразу "я очень эмпатичный человек". И, знаете, порой действительно удивляет, когда слышишь подобные слова, соотносишь их с действиями и… хм… видишь некоторые несостыковки, расхождения между словами и реальным положением вещей. К чему я? Да, собственно, ни к чему конкретн…
🤔10❤4🌚3😈1
Подсмотрел я, значит, у одного хорошего человека идею. Идея эта связана с ведением группы тут, в ”телеге”. Само собой, ничего нового, но меня вдохновило. В чем идея? Да просто постить разные умности и разности без какого-то особенного контекста. С одной стороны, я мог бы с вами пооткровенничать и рассказать всякого, но такие вещи же не делаются на широкую аудиторию, правда. Можно, конечно, но надо быть или очень скуч…
❤22👍12🤔4🗿1😇1
Братья и сестры, "Дуга 4" скоро выйдет в свой новый эфир. Будете ли вы готовы ее услышать и узнать историю, которую поведает ее ведущий? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ-3aO4VGjU
🔥33❤15
Привет. Хотел поделиться с вами радостными новостями, но потом подумал, что подьебывать вас на первое апреля вместе с остальными как-то пошло, поэтому просто с днём...ну, не дурака, нет. С днём простака, скажем так)
😁31❤16
File, posted without a caption
👍19❤9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZoLprWGAww Я обещал необычную озвучку. Чтож, вот и она. Т.к. эта вещь сделана не ради фана а ради, как говорится, всеобщего блага, я, в порядке исключения, приложу и аудиоверсию. Приятного прослушивания и изменения, слышащие. Как сказал Джокер, главное, чтобы дошел смысл послания...
👍12❤3🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤42👍16🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blaineisapain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Дамы и господа, пока я продолжаю озвучивать Зуммерков и работаю над озвучкой продолжения Батюшек, предлагаю вам выбрать, какую историю я сделаю, чтобы это немного разбавить. Вот вам на выбор 3 автора.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРИПЕРС (Истории от BlaineIsAPain)” (@blaineisapain), 1,235 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blaineisapain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.