Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 64 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 683–706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 16:38
701
+5
30 Sept 2026, 16:01
696
-7
16 Sept 2026, 01:36
703
+2
9 Sept 2026, 08:16
701
+3
30 Aug 2026, 00:54
698
+5
23 Aug 2026, 11:24
693
+4
15 Aug 2026, 12:09
689
+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
686
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:19
686
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 11 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9
33.3%
👎
7
25.9%
🔥
3
11.1%
🤡
3
11.1%
💔
2
7.41%
😢
2
7.41%
😁
1
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2023 to 23 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
http://qvwje7edtrfby6pfnm3q7o3lju22mfx3xsjyl3y33l66sbq3qcnlmvad.onion/index.php
SecretForums has gone online! Site is still under development so if you find any bugs let me know. At the moment only Tor is on but clearnet will come soon.
The new owner will take over very soon.
~ Astounding EX Blackforums admin.
BlackForums project has come to a stop. I have been diagnosed with something and wont be able to keep up the site and every service we ever offered. I have spoken to a person who will make a new forum based off BlackForums DB. Since 7th of april we have been online all i have to say that these months where the most beautiful of my life. I have met so many new friends and people which i honestly have to say amazed me.…
BlackForums and all the groups connected to it are now solely owned by me(@astounding). Thank you for the support you have given me over these past days since the incident happened, much appreciated to everyone who wanted to help or helped.
Groups owned by Blackforums:
@blacksecc
@blackforumsbf
@blackforumschat
@blackmailuwu
@blackvaultcc
@blackroseltd
As to make a statement regarding some of your concerns. He cannot dox me as he doesn't know my name(only one name) we never had socials or knew eachother's emails. No photos of me or him have been taken(weirdly he has a photo of my ass).
If anything comes up that can ruin my OPSEC i will let you know.
As far as i know he wont try anything against me since i have way way more leverage against him.
As of now i hold …
Seems like lemonade stole 2k from me.
After 8 months of doing nothing this retard stole my money cuz he was "poor" well now i guess he will never see any money again from me.
All the perms have been revoked. He never had access to the full backend, only limited access. No user data can be leaked from him. After we have been friends for nearly 8 years he decides to fuck me over right when i needed him the most.
Full…
Blackmail has been officially released! You can go create an account at blackmail.lol/registration.html
Since the site is very new we are offering a bug hunting program. We are going to give away upgrades on blackforums for vulns found.
What are your thoughts on making BlackVault.CC a server that you can upload to from CLI?
e.g.
[eom@eom blf/bv] $ node upload.js @KmetaNaEvropa.ZIP
Uploading archive to blackvault.cc/?? [######----]
All genuine suggestions will be considered
Due to the absolute mockery that BlackVault, as an OSINT engine, has become due to @xkey_info outperforming us; we are going to go back to using BlackVault as an encrypted file service.
If you have any suggestions for BV (encryption method, accounts(??), paid plans, ads) message @eomlol.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @blackvaultcc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@blackvaultcc named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@astounding named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@blackforumschat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ghostsec420 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@xkey_info named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlackVault - OSS File Hosting” (@blackvaultcc), 701 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackvaultcc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.