Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
57,000 average views per post against 78,619 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.4%. Across the 8,375 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.03% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,423,900
Mature posts only
74.2% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,267–78,862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:59
78,619
-53
15 Sept 2026, 23:39
78,672
-6
14 Sept 2026, 08:15
78,678
+36
12 Sept 2026, 19:20
78,642
+529
10 Sept 2026, 17:36
78,113
+203
7 Sept 2026, 11:41
77,910
+230
4 Sept 2026, 12:17
77,680
+19
2 Sept 2026, 21:54
77,661
-44
1 Sept 2026, 22:13
77,705
-86
31 Aug 2026, 19:06
77,791
-12
30 Aug 2026, 21:43
77,803
+12
30 Aug 2026, 00:25
77,791
-35
29 Aug 2026, 02:12
77,826
+126
28 Aug 2026, 04:04
77,700
-47
27 Aug 2026, 05:08
77,747
-47
26 Aug 2026, 08:33
77,794
-52
25 Aug 2026, 07:56
77,846
-59
24 Aug 2026, 04:43
77,905
-26
22 Aug 2026, 10:39
77,931
+25
21 Aug 2026, 04:22
77,906
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 78,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
57,000
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
62 (23 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,423,900
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
332
Videos
109
Links
132
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Так блять
Приложение новое настроил, какойто сервер купил ебучий, чтобы не прерывалось ничего, телефоны взял, повербанк взял, решил на машине ехать, чтобы если че локации менять, в итоге щас пробки какието на выезде с моей деревни, думаю похуй ехать куда глаза глядят и паралельно стрим запускать? Если че со мной в пробках постоите ?
Пора спать
Очень устал
8 часов легких дали
Спасибо всем донатерам, ваша поддержка пойдет на очень крутой контент, скоро вы все увидите, любовь и уважение 🫡
СЕГОДНЯ СТРИМ ЕЩЕ ОДИН СДЕЛАЕМ В 20:00
Продолжение вчерашнего разговорного, думал некст стрим запущу только уже как обычно через неделю - ИРЛ
Но что-то время освободилось свободное, решил еще чуть домашнего дать, придете ?
Хотя может уже завтра, что-то тут интернет жестко дудосится…
Ща подумаю, дайте 5 минут
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @blacknoyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вишенка 🍒 @mamavisshenka · 117,615 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 August 2026
Мюсли Янчика @ynchq · 94,107 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 August 2026
каечка @bykae4ka · 207,272 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
ванг ас фак @wangasfuck · 123,084 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026
Кореш @koreshzy · 829,871 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
БетМены @betboom_3boys · 101,965 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
ХАЗЯЕВА ТВИЧА @xazayevatyt · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 11 September 2026
Exile @exilemusic13 · 1,445,701 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
ФРАМЕ ТАМЕР @oieiei · 685,689 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ @xazayeva · 368,952 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
Влад Раговский @GABARITVLAD · 203,517 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ @paradeevich · 1,059,396 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
ЧУГУНДА @chugunda · 91,972 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
OPPO Россия @opporussia_official · 27,272 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 10 September 2026
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍 @danila_gorilla · 643,829 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 August 2026
Асфальт @asfalt222 · 82,434 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
STOPBAN OFFICIAL @stopbaba · 187,581 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
PLOHOY PAREN @plohoypacan · 380,482 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FrameStream” (@blacknoyt), 78,619 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacknoyt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.