Channel
@blacklist_bee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,882subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001275483302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blacklist_bee |
| Created | 30 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blacklist_bee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 1,882 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 1,886 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,887 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 1,887 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 57 | 79.2% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 15.3% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2024 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛜 LTE Список прокси 🖤 Проверялись на МТС и Билайн. В дневное время из-за высоких нагрузок возможен высокий пинг, в вечернее время работает лучше. 🛡 Прокси №1 🛡 Прокси №2 🛡 Прокси №3 🛡 Прокси №4 🛡 Прокси №5 🛡 Прокси №6 🛡 Прокси №7 🛡 Прокси №8 🛡 Прокси №9 🛡 Прокси №10 🛡 Прокси №11 🛡 Прокси Starlink 🍯⚡️ Медовые прокси
🔠 Мороз выбил гул из ульев: названа цена спасения миллионов пчелиных семей Весна на пасеках в этом году запахнет не только мёдом, но и тревожной статистикой. Председатель Московского городского общества пчеловодов Валерий Капунин в программе "Точка зрения" на Pravda.Ru рассказал, почему отрасли грозит острая нехватка пчелопакетов. 🐝 Пчёлы уходили в холодный сезон ослабленными из-за погодных и климатических условий,…
👍5
Video, posted without a caption
💩11👍5
❤️ Пчелы на грани: как гибель пчел угрожает продовольственной безопасности России В мире стремительно сокращается численность пчел. Это уже не локальная проблема пчеловодов, а глобальная угроза, которая может привести к продовольственному кризису ➡️ ПОДРОБНОСТИ... В 2025 году российские пасеки снова столкнулись с массовой гибелью пчел, что ставит под удар не только производство меда, но и всю сельскохозяйственную о…
Ликвидация пчеловодства в России Массовая гибель пчел из-за бесконтрольного применения ядохимикатов при обработке сельхозкультур. Геноцид пчел. 🗯Содержание: 00:01 Введение • Юрий Жмайлов, дипломированный специалист по пчеловодству с более чем 40-летним опытом, анализирует причины краха пчеловодства в России. 00:53 Критика современных аграриев 01:40 Проблемы после развала СССР • Неграмотные аграрии начали использова…
👍4
ДОзнание с Ильдаром Исангуловым. Пчёлы вместо дронов Часть 3. 🗯 Содержание: 🕒 00:45 : Пчёлы вместо дронов - финансируемые западом биолабаротории на территории Украины. 🕒 02:20 : Биологические диверсии против нашей страны посредством завоза зараженных пчел из средней Азии. 🕒 04:30 : ЦРУ, США и пчелы - какая между ними связь? 🕒 06:01 : Букет странных заболеваний в пчелопакетах, ввозимых с Узбекистана. 🕒 07:40 : Гибнут…
⚡️У арзамасского пчеловода украли 10 семей пчёл! Ели кто-то обладает информацией по поводу произошедшего, просьба написать в личку t.me/+79601669572 Сергей ❗️Максимальный репост. ЧСП - Подпишись и отправь друзьям!
👍2
Posted without readable text
Рекомендуем пользователям обновить Telegram. В новой версии реализована функция, направленная на борьбу с мошенничеством. Теперь при связи с незнакомым номером пользователи смогут увидеть дату регистрации и страну, в которой зарегистрирован телефонный номер. Если данные сведения не соответствует тому, что говорит (или кем представляется) собеседник – лучше прекратить общение. Так же с осторожностью стоит относиться к…
👍3
Рамиль - он вам не Димон! Или наследие Капунина… часть первая ☝️ Матюшкин рубит правду. Шавкат - золотой фонд это все пчеловоды России, а не отдельные их представители!
👍4
❗️ В WhatsApp распространяется опасный вирус "Graphite", который может воровать доступ к вашим банковским счетам Вирус распространяется через групповые чаты в виде PDF-файлов и устанавливается автоматически даже без открытия. Он ворует всю личную информацию, в том числе пароли от банковских приложений и Госуслуг. Мошенники пытаются получить платежные данные жертв для преступных целей – для безопасности выключите ав…
👍1
Кудашев, Матюшкин - Стрим о союзах. Последовательность вопросов и ответов не всегда правильная. 📱 ЧСП - отправь друзьям!
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blacklist_bee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваше доверие к СПР, как видите его будущее? Несколько вариантов.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2024 to 20 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чёрный список пчеловодов” (@blacklist_bee), 1,882 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacklist_bee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.