Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Black Jesus

Channel

Black Jesus

@blackjesus1337

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,816subscribers

-98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001400737150
TypeChannel
Username@blackjesus1337
CreatedBetween 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blackjesus1337

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8066,9146,8607 August 2026 — 6,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,914 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,913 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,901 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,870 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,845 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,830 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,818 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,806 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,816 subscribers6,8167 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,790–6,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:176,816+10
14 Sept 2026, 07:196,806-12
11 Sept 2026, 00:016,818-12
5 Sept 2026, 18:196,830-15
2 Sept 2026, 01:366,845-25
30 Aug 2026, 05:536,870-22
26 Aug 2026, 19:286,892-5
24 Aug 2026, 02:386,897+6
20 Aug 2026, 09:216,891-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:146,892-9
14 Aug 2026, 05:486,901-7
10 Aug 2026, 17:066,908-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:536,913-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:166,914no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:056,914first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 3 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

468 reactions across 23 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18840.2%
🤪6012.8%
👍439.19%
😭357.48%
🍌296.20%
🔥285.98%
😁214.49%
💯163.42%
❤‍🔥122.56%
🎉91.92%
👀61.28%
😐61.28%
🌭40.855%
🍾40.855%
👌20.427%
🥰20.427%
🍓10.214%
😍10.214%
🤩10.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 23 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blackjesus1337. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,000 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ну че.. Пора поговорить за обнову, всем приятного просмотра. ТЫК 🙈

4🤪1

10 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,020 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ну что дождались.. (молимся чтобы все было хорошо) 👣

🔥17❤‍🔥43🤪1

9 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,060 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎲 Я РАЗОБРАЛ ГЕНИАЛЬНЫЙ ОБМАН Ложь, в которую ты верил годами... Приятного просмотра, брат 🎩 ▶️ Смотреть

🤪9

2 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,570 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО НА КАНАЛЕ, ПРИЯТНОГО ПРОСМОТРА БРАТ 🎩

8😁2🤪1😭1

26 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC≈3,300 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ВСЕМ КУ И ПРИЯТНОГО ПРОСМОТРА 😘

11🤪1

19 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈4,070 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

СПАСАЕМ ГЕТТО ВМЕСТЕ 💂🏿‍♀️ ТЫК 👣

12🤪2

12 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC≈4,490 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

А ВОТ И ВИДЕО ПРИЕХАЛО 🎩🪿🧐

🤪152👀1

21 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC≈7,950 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Может запустим на стриме сервер первой версии SAMP?

  1. Да78%
  2. Неа22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎉92👀1

21 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC≈6,480 views17 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня изучаем как выглядела первая версия сампа 🥸🤓🥸

🍌95👍2👀1

7 Jun 2026, 09:53 UTC≈10,200 views61 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всех поздравляю, вышел новый лаунчер от ЭИРа🎩 О всех новинках, примеры использования и новости о грядущем ArizonaPatches в новом видео 🥂

49❤‍🔥5🌭4👍3

6 Jun 2026, 22:16 UTC≈6,960 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Зря вы так со шляпами. Им ведь можно было найти вполне полезное применение: поставил аккаунт в АФК, накрыл персонажа шляпой и вуаля, ничего не видно на экране. Монитор не светит в глаза, и можно спокойно поспать, всем спокойной ночи кстати 😴😴😴

👍265💯1

3 Jun 2026, 04:50 UTC≈6,860 views19 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Ну что, про вайп поговорили, теперь к серьёзным вопросам. Представьте: на Аризоне добавили батлпасс с кучей безумно красивых шляп. Всем они нравятся, но есть нюанс... Если надеть такую шляпу, в игре почти ничего не видно. Носили бы всё равно?

  1. Да, ведь шляпа слишком красивая!29%
  2. Нет, ведь я в ней почти ничего не вижу71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥10🍌6🍓1👀1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @blackjesus1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTCAnonymous Poll617 voters

Может запустим на стриме сервер первой версии SAMP?

  1. Да78%
  2. Неа22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2026, 04:50 UTCAnonymous Poll760 voters

Ну что, про вайп поговорили, теперь к серьёзным вопросам. Представьте: на Аризоне добавили батлпасс с кучей безумно красивых шляп. Всем они нравятся, но есть нюанс... Если надеть такую шляпу, в игре почти ничего не видно. Носили бы всё равно?

  1. Да, ведь шляпа слишком красивая!29%
  2. Нет, ведь я в ней почти ничего не вижу71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Jun 2026, 20:57 UTCAnonymous Poll880 voters

Кто за вайп?

  1. Я за вайп!71%
  2. Я против!29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 May 2026, 05:30 UTCAnonymous Poll1,060 voters approx.

Да начнётся великая битва! ГТА Сан Андрес или Копатель Онлайн?

  1. ГТА Сан Андрес54%
  2. Копатель Онлайн57%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HitOk Dungeon
@hitokchannel · 30,836
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Black Jesus” (@blackjesus1337), 6,816 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackjesus1337.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.