Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 04BlackFire04

Channel

04BlackFire04

@blackfire04

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,462subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692126527
TypeChannel
Username@blackfire04
Created3 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/blackfire04

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@w0ter4eek/786214 Feb 2026, 08:20 UTC@blackfire04/2536 · this entry14 Feb 2026, 08:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@w0ter4eek/786528 Feb 2026, 08:09 UTC@blackfire04/2537 · this entry1 Mar 2026, 21:17 UTC1.0037 hours
@w0ter4eek/78667 Mar 2026, 08:09 UTC@blackfire04/2538 · this entry7 Mar 2026, 08:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@w0ter4eek/786714 Mar 2026, 09:02 UTC@blackfire04/2539 · this entry14 Mar 2026, 09:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@w0ter4eek/78694 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC@blackfire04/2541 · this entry4 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@w0ter4eek/787118 Apr 2026, 08:08 UTC@blackfire04/2544 · this entry18 Apr 2026, 08:08 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@w0ter4eek17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@w0ter4eek (16–1)
@bukin_pel8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–0)
@marianpell5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutes@marianpell (3–2)
@fanatik_pel5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0056 minutes@fanatik_pel (5–0)
@Miyagov5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0053 minutes@Miyagov (3–2)
@fhesl39k5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0056 minutes@fhesl39k (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 32 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 January 2026 to 23 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @fanatik_pel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,4621,5551,508.57 August 2026 — 1,555 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,555 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,550 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,542 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,538 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,535 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,532 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,530 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,528 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,526 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,525 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,524 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,522 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,518 subscribers29 September 2026 — 1,505 subscribers7 October 2026 — 1,497 subscribers13 October 2026 — 1,492 subscribers16 October 2026 — 1,490 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,485 subscribers22 October 2026 — 1,481 subscribers25 October 2026 — 1,477 subscribers28 October 2026 — 1,474 subscribers1 November 2026 — 1,472 subscribers4 November 2026 — 1,467 subscribers7 November 2026 — 1,466 subscribers10 November 2026 — 1,462 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,448–1,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 19:201,462-4
7 Nov 2026, 05:391,466-1
4 Nov 2026, 09:491,467-5
1 Nov 2026, 01:261,472-2
28 Oct 2026, 18:081,474-3
25 Oct 2026, 15:361,477-4
22 Oct 2026, 12:591,481-4
18 Oct 2026, 22:351,485-5
16 Oct 2026, 05:181,490-2
13 Oct 2026, 13:371,492-5
7 Oct 2026, 03:381,497-8
29 Sept 2026, 19:571,505-13
19 Sept 2026, 08:381,518-4
14 Sept 2026, 17:011,522-2
10 Sept 2026, 19:411,524-1
5 Sept 2026, 12:401,525-1
1 Sept 2026, 04:151,526-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:561,528-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:341,530-2
23 Aug 2026, 13:221,532first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28778.0%
👍297.88%
🔥297.88%
❤‍🔥205.43%
🤩10.272%
🤯10.272%
🥰10.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 May 2026, 07:55 UTC545 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ АВТОРИТЕТ на РОДИНЕ! КТО ПРИЕХАЛ К НАМ НА БАЗУ?? ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/o-ThDC3Jk70?si=tRWD3qFrtY_yt4mG 📌https://youtu.be/o-ThDC3Jk70?si=tRWD3qFrtY_yt4mG

❤‍🔥15❤3👍3🔥3🥰1

16 May 2026, 08:23 UTC695 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️КАМЕРА ВСЕ ЗАПИСАЛА… схрон В ЛЕСУ! ЦЕНА ДРУЖБЫ… ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/RWm0TCwYrTo?si=iW4TcnFiwVcHXwgP 📌https://youtu.be/RWm0TCwYrTo?si=iW4TcnFiwVcHXwgP

❤13

2 May 2026, 08:14 UTC734 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️обменял РОЛС на ГЕЛИК что бы увидеть ФАРХАТА НА КАВКАЗЕ 7 лет спустя.. ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/ercHSi1Gy6Y?is=1OCTB4PvUiD8lgNZ 📌https://youtu.be/ercHSi1Gy6Y?is=1OCTB4PvUiD8lgNZ

❤14

26 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC765 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️СХРОН БАНДИТА В ЛЕСУ, что мы НАШЛИ В ИЗБЕ?? ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/1VetHuRoCYM?si=7VNO-vqK-derCtbZ 📌https://youtu.be/1VetHuRoCYM?si=7VNO-vqK-derCtbZ

❤10👍1🔥1

22 Apr 2026, 08:12 UTC719 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ИЗ ЕВРОПЫ СРАЗУ В ТЮРЬМУ! что пошло НЕ ТАК! ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/rlYHmi-iwjM?si=JM3GOgY7z2-hlJ_W 📌https://youtu.be/rlYHmi-iwjM?si=JM3GOgY7z2-hlJ_W

❤15❤‍🔥3

18 Apr 2026, 08:08 UTC674 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️НАПАДЕНИЕ С НОЖОМ!! пробил КОЛЕСО - ПОЛУЧИЛ ОТВЕТКУ! ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/xbi3v9eXAuc?si=JymqZaIvIgllh52B 📌https://youtu.be/xbi3v9eXAuc?si=JymqZaIvIgllh52B

🔥14

11 Apr 2026, 14:19 UTC748 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤32👍4🔥3❤‍🔥1🤩1🤯1

11 Apr 2026, 14:18 UTC665 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ХИТРЫЙ БАНДИТ из 90х ОКАЗАЛСЯ УБИЙЦЕЙ и застрелил на камеру.. ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/V5m8caADVLs?si=fKlLiyHqW3a6dwmX 📌https://youtu.be/V5m8caADVLs?si=fKlLiyHqW3a6dwmX

❤19

4 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC725 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ВОЛНЫ ХЕЙТА И НЕ ПОНИМАНИЯ, пора ЭТО заканчивать... ➖ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК и напишите КОММЕНТАРИЙ! Это поможет в продвижении ролика! Ведь возможно, скоро конец... ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/6u_LjB3LhHM?is=yICjyB3ZwUz62fVT 📌https://youtu.be/6u_LjB3LhHM?is=yICjyB3ZwUz62fVT

❤13👍1🔥1

21 Mar 2026, 08:06 UTC817 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️РАЗБИЛИ машину! ПРОКЛЯТАЯ ТРАССА, что скрывает СТАРЫЙ БАНДИТ? 🔴Не забываем ставить ЛАЙКИ и написать КОММЕНТАРИЙ 🔴СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО : https://youtu.be/KzwIX_6_m-Q?si=UnxK8ArpMfCFj_yB

❤10👍1🔥1

14 Mar 2026, 09:02 UTC854 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️БАНДИТЫ ИЗ 90 ых НА НАШИХ УСЛОВИЯХ! ❗️Не забывайте ставить лайки И комментарии 💬 ‼️СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО : https://youtu.be/uIxYWbqICmA?is=iaLJyI4y11azsdLF

❤10

7 Mar 2026, 08:09 UTC906 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️ПРОЧЬ ИЗ МОЕГО ДОМА! люди из ТЮРЬМЫ угрожают НАМ! ⚡️Смотреть видео на ютубе: 📌https://youtu.be/AG_M18mBlyk?is=vs5NFknrXRwIcdxb 📌https://youtu.be/AG_M18mBlyk?is=vs5NFknrXRwIcdxb

❤11

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blackfire04. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

► ► ► Паша ПЭЛ 🟢
@pel_video · 291,071
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“04BlackFire04” (@blackfire04), 1,462 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackfire04.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.