Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐋𝐒

Channel

𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐋𝐒

@blackangelslip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

359subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002475055093
TypeChannel
Username@blackangelslip
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 6 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blackangelslip

Growth

3293593447 August 2026 — 329 subscribers8 August 2026 — 342 subscribers8 August 2026 — 342 subscribers15 August 2026 — 359 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 325–364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:43359+17
8 Aug 2026, 07:01342no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:14342+13
7 Aug 2026, 12:00329first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

584 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544044460008068195714524.8%
custom 544085525908372093513623.3%
custom 544083438554266265211619.9%
custom 52130219242291441948214.0%
custom 53593736306250491506110.4%
custom 5258348505105185681111.88%
custom 5352943665150970674101.71%
custom 547420367438744113581.37%
custom 535969622991362134571.20%
custom 535967788610830152661.03%
custom 523598333049466464020.342%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2025 to 13 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blackangelslip. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2025 to 13 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2025, 00:03 UTC≈1,800 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 535937363062504915015custom 52583485051051856819custom 54404446000806819576custom 53596778861083015264custom 53596962299136213454custom 54408552590837209354custom 54742036743874411353

Signed Vien Davis

13 Oct 2025, 00:03 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Vien Davis

12 Oct 2025, 10:48 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🪽🪽 video by:: @Vien_yn

custom 54404446000806819576custom 53596962299136213453custom 54408343855426626523custom 54742036743874411353custom 53593736306250491502custom 53596778861083015262custom 54408552590837209352

Signed Vien Davis

12 Oct 2025, 10:45 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Vien Davis

25 Sept 2025, 20:39 UTC≈1,490 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

поставьте реакций, нашему любимому бывшему админу по нью, спасибо ей за старание и помощь 🌸

custom 544085525908372093514custom 53593736306250491505custom 54408343855426626523custom 52583485051051856812custom 54742036743874411352

Signed Vien Davis

25 Sept 2025, 20:39 UTC≈1,460 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

солнышки мои, я ухожу с вирта. вы мне подарили незабываемые эмоции и я безумна рада, что зашла в эту кф. каждый день проходил как огонь. никогда мне не было так комфортно как у вас. спасибо вам большое за поддержку, за то, что были рядом, когда было сложно. очень сильно впс всех люблю. удачи вам в продвижении кф 🫶🏻🫶🏻🫶🏻 виен, безумно тебя люблю.

custom 535937363062504915028custom 544085525908372093515custom 544044460008068195714custom 54408343855426626525custom 53529436651509706743

Signed Vien Davis

21 Sept 2025, 07:08 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝑽𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒔

21 Sept 2025, 07:08 UTC≈1,420 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🪽🪽 video by:: @HQYHI

custom 544044460008068195713custom 544085525908372093510custom 53593736306250491509custom 54408343855426626526custom 53529436651509706744

Signed 𝑽𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒔

21 Sept 2025, 07:06 UTC≈1,780 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🪽🪽 video by:: @Vien_yn

custom 544085525908372093512custom 544044460008068195710custom 54408343855426626529custom 53529436651509706743custom 53593736306250491502

Signed 𝑽𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒔

21 Sept 2025, 07:02 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝑽𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒔

20 Aug 2025, 22:30 UTC≈2,530 views47 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

🤍

custom 544044460008068195717custom 544083438554266265212custom 544085525908372093510custom 52130219242291441946custom 52359833304946646402

Signed 𝑽𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒔

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @blackangelslip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,128,555 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐋𝐒” (@blackangelslip), 359 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackangelslip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.