2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:02
1
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:33
1
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Links
19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
2
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2024 to 15 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
Запускаем предновогодний розыгрыш🎄🎁
Призы:
1 место - Xros 4 pro + 2 картриджа + 2 банки жижи
2 место - Одноразка Lost Mary MO20000 Pro
3 место - 2 катриджа на ваше устройство
4 место - telegram premium на 1 месяц
Условия розыгрыша:
1) Быть подписанным на нас.
2) Оставить комментарий под этой записью со словом «Участвую».
3) Сделать репост этой записи в любую социальную сеть.
Итоги объявим 25 ноября🥳
Всем уд
😱Ещё давным давно...😱
😁Ещё давным давно, когда я только зашёл в MemeFi coin, я создал свой клан, и теперь хочу поделиться им с вами, скорее вступайте в него, и забирайте топоповые плюшки😁
Вступить в @Klan
💸Свежие новости в мире крипты
💲Все о дропах, тестнетах, листингах
https://t.me/OnlyCryptoFamily
💥 Чек от @FreeTON_DropBot на 17.6 TON
Количество активаций: 4000
Сумма активации: 0.0022 TON
Реферальная награда: 0.0022 TON (100%)
💬 🌟🤍 Всем Mishkam privet 🤍🌟
🍒☕️ Наверно Mishki еще незнали о существовании проекта FoxPrize (Лисов) ☕️🍒
🎶📝 Расскажу вам немного о проекте FoxPrize 📝🎶
❄️🥳 В нем вы тоже можете зарабатывать приглашая активных друзей, но деньги получают только топеры 🥳❄️
🤔 Что за топеры?🤔
💸💰 К…
🚀 Rocket-чек на 16.375625 TON (8 113.1₽)
Внутри чека: 3743 активация(й) по 0.0035 TON (1.7₽) с реферальной наградой 0.000875 TON (0.4₽)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blablar2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,266,734 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@blablar2024 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@usdtairdrop_zoc_bot named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blabla” (@blablar2024), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blablar2024.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
