歐元 167cm 47kg E奶 25歲 職業:#氣質香水櫃姐 身材高挑氣質好 私藏高檔妹 #車模 身材高挑 胸型好看 膚白 腿直 #短兼2天 高級臉蛋 很慾 床上悶騷 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888

Channel
美腿氣質小姐姐🇹🇼(筷子腿/鉛筆腿/長腿/足交)
@bjziq888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
677subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001918943506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bjziq888 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bjziq888 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 677 | +21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 656 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 638 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 638 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 68.7%
- avg views ÷ 677 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 465
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.202%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (15 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,395 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
金娜 169cm.47kg.D奶.25歲 纖細修長的身材和優雅的氣質 沒想到床上是個超淫蕩騷貨 今天只做你的小母狗 性慾強玩得開 叫床聲音很浪 很會撒嬌 會讓人想加節的慾望 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
❤1
林桐165cm/C+奶/47kg/23歲 單身女 很享受愛愛的快感 主動迎合你所有進攻 床上各種挑逗撩撥你 主動跪在你的胯下吹舔,你忍得住拒絕她嗎 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
🎉 專屬大奶妹特輯:滿足你對豪乳的渴望 學生組 (5000-7000) 薇薇:151cm Ecup 44kg 19歲 (樹德) 嵐嵐:158cm Fcup 48kg 21歲 (文藻) 小薰:160cm Ecup 47kg 20歲 (文藻) 糖糖:162cm Dcup 46kg 19歲 (樹德) 🎀 特色:清純、年輕、犯罪感、反差萌 空姐組 (8000- 10000) 小貓:168cm Fcup 47kg 26歲 (華航) 櫻桃:172cm Ecup 49kg 25歲 (長榮) 🎀 特色:高顏值、氣質出眾、溫柔撩人、騷氣滿滿 麻豆組 (10000-12000) 心淩:166cm Ecup 48kg 22歲 艾妮:172cm Fcup 51kg 25歲 泡泡:168cm Gcup 50kg 24歲 小恩:165cm Ecup 48kg 23歲 🎀 特色:美腿、冷豔、氣質出眾、強姦式服務,帶你突破極限 櫃姐組 (35…
👒名字:猜猜 164cm / 42kg / Dcup / 25歲 👒詳細簡介:沉醉於她獨特的氣質美嬌小玲瓏 卻擁有完美比例的身材,尤其是那柔軟豐滿的 上圍 她那充滿神秘感的眼神,更是讓人無法抗拒 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
❤6
佟麗婭 170 D 52kg 26歲 臉蛋清秀 魔鬼身材 皮膚細白 粉色乳頭 小穴緊緊的包裹著你 服務配合度高 敢玩 喇舌 69 深喉嚨 深插 各種姿勢 喜歡密我 不要錯過!!! 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
小曼 166cm/47kg/Ccup/23歲 小嘴吸舔肉棒很有一套 深吸啃咬 酥酥麻麻的感覺 讓你飄飄然 妹妹身材凹凸有致 渾圓酥胸柔軟Q彈 可吸 可舔可摳她小粉穴 收縮力度很強 蜜汁可吸舔 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
潔西卡166公分 D- E 罩杯 24歲 氣質御姐型 不是那種一眼張揚的美 而是越看越上癮的那種存在 皮膚光滑白皙 鎖骨線條乾淨 身形比例修長 她不吵 但很會撩 氣質佳 懂生活 更懂你 該溫柔的時候溫柔 該主動的時候也不會讓你失望 約會不只是見面 而是讓你放鬆 讓你被好好對待 她屬於成熟男人會懂得珍惜的那一型 🤍
妍希 168-46kg-D-35歲 氣質滿分的淫蕩熟女姐姐 外表斯文優雅,笑起來溫柔迷人 私底下卻是極品小騷貨 釀越久的酒越香 年紀越大越會玩 很會主動、很會夾 很會叫,技術與騷度都拉滿 🌻私訊TG:@ziq888 🌻選妃頻道:@eyny8 🌻Gleezy搜索 :ziq888 【熟女系列】 【學生系列】 【高檔系列】 【特殊系列】 【雙飛系列】 【美腿系列】 【肉肉系列】 【大奶系列】 🌈:一鍵加入晴子俱樂部所有Gleezy群組 🌈鏈接:https://portaly.cc/ziq888
❤5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bjziq888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 529,975 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bjziq888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美腿氣質小姐姐🇹🇼(筷子腿/鉛筆腿/長腿/足交)” (@bjziq888), 677 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bjziq888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.