10 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026
开课
Channel
凡凡（莲湖区）
@bjgbhhhhy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003980561552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bjgbhhhhy |
| Description | 用户名：@ytrio1 |
| Created | 7 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bjgbhhhhy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 60 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 60 | +47 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 337.5%
- avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 203
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (7 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,215 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
10 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC41 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @xianlycp
【评价等级】: 👍 好评 【日 期】: 2026-08-09 【验 证 人】: 沉默 【美女昵称】: 凡凡 【地 区】: 莲湖区 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【年 龄】: 22 【凶 器】: c 【服务过程】: 先说结论，体验感很好，我只恨自己小老弟太快了。一开门见到老师第一印象就是特别开朗，细皮嫩肉，青春貌美。我就喜欢活泼型的，非常对味。进来就是老师帮忙洗澡。然后是口活，我恨自己太敏感，老师还很贴心 口的很轻。第一次看这个视角，只能说是非常享受。然后就是正常的流程，服务该有的都有。后入很有感觉，有臀浪和腰窝，推荐出击的兄弟尝试后入，特别刺激，过几天必2刷刷刷！ 西安怡红院:✳️@xianyhybei
10 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
【所属群组】：西安一品楼 【时间】：2026-08-09 【老师】：凡凡 【留名】：一缕清风 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：8 【服务】：9 【态度】：9.2 【环境】：9 【综合】：8.87 【过程】：本人是比较挑剔的，也很注重感觉，凡凡老师能给我这种感觉，颜值好身材好皮肤白嫩，妆造干净自然，五官精致，胸大小正合适，太大就不喜欢了，她这个大小正好 胸型完美，手感超棒！最主要的是配合度高，提出的几个姿势都很配合，小穴紧致 水多 顶不住根本顶不住！走的时候都有些不舍，期待下次见面，有空必刷！ ✅本条车评一品楼已通过： @XA_YPL
9 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC267 viewsread 10 August 2026
开课
9 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC246 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @xianlycp
【评价等级】: 👍 好评 【日 期】: 2026-08-08 【验 证 人】: Che ll 【美女昵称】: 凡凡 【地 区】: 莲湖区 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【年 龄】: 22 【凶 器】: C 【服务过程】: 到达地点遥控上楼，开门见到凡凡妹子本人挺满意的，主动上交水费，凡凡妹子本人很有气质，皮肤白白净净的，妹子热情的要帮忙沐浴，我没让 不太习惯，但这积极的态度让人心里暖暖的；洗完澡妹妹帮忙擦干，主动牵手拉着我上床，开始进入战斗 ，🐍吻通透，妹妹好温柔，个子小小，给我口活也非常有感觉，此处省略小黄文…… 总结妹妹口技不错，颜值清纯，脾气好，态度好，颜值我非常喜欢，抗着艹非常带劲。颜控的师兄们无脑冲就对了～ 西安怡红院:✳️@xianyhybei
7 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC574 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo
用户名：@ytrio1 双向机器人：@xnbbxsj_bot
7 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bjgbhhhhy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,148,701 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“凡凡（莲湖区）” (@bjgbhhhhy), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bjgbhhhhy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.