Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BIT Traders

Channel

BIT Traders

@bittraders111

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,886subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002196585792
TypeChannel
Username@bittraders111
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bittraders111

Growth

5,8845,8875,885.57 August 2026 — 5,887 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,884 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,886 subscribers5,8867 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,884–5,887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:485,886+2
10 Aug 2026, 19:145,884-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:015,887no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:165,887first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.9%
avg views ÷ 5,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.901%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held12 (2 June 202620 July 2026)
Views total8,100
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

540 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍28252.2%
12823.7%
🔥8515.7%
458.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 540reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC≈2,820 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

"Что это, если не бычка?" (с) Грачев

18👍10🔥91

20 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC≈2,760 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

По #OZON ситуация интересная, пожалуй одна из немногих акций, которая не упала до цен 2022 года 📈

👍17

20 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,520 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#OZON сегодня я не смог понять 📊

👍18

6 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC≈3,980 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$VANRY читаемо двигается 📊

30👍20🔥51

1 Jul 2026, 03:45 UTC≈5,360 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Там снова участник по Bitget разгоняет монеты, прям как в ноябре 2025 📈 Тема такая, сначала перестановкой плотностей монету заталкивают на лонги, потом сливаю. Все происходит одним днем 📊

👍5552

26 Jun 2026, 04:27 UTC≈5,480 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

MOEX на 7:26 по Мск Если падение индекса продолжится, увидим хорошие движения 📊

19🔥72👍1

25 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC≈3,590 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Также следует обратит внимание на RUAL, вместе с металлами и индексом может снести свои лои 📉

👍205

25 Jun 2026, 07:34 UTC≈3,090 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Помимо падения индекса MOEX, металлы тоже теряют в цене, таким образом создавая дополнительное давление на золотодобывающие компании 📉 Так что следите за PLZL, там есть за что цепляться в случае продолжения тенденции 📊

👍223

10 Jun 2026, 09:55 UTC≈4,380 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда скальпер слышит про алгоритм, он всегда представляет какой-то четкий определяемый след в стакане, но это большая редкость 📊 Большинство алгоритмичных пампов монет (это только криптовалютное явление), происходит без явных следов. Чтобы увидеть их, нужно обладать опытом и насмотренностью 💎 По графику VELVET можно увидеть, как монета ходит определенной лесенкой и в какой-то момент проливается (этот пролив связан

👍3522

2 Jun 2026, 22:30 UTC≈5,200 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Никогда такого не было, и вот снова 🤷‍♂️ Тренд на закачку деньгами мусора и последующий его дамп продолжает развитие 📉 К сожалению именно на этом сливе заработать не удалось в отличии от прошлых монет, не смог просчитать правильно тайминги входа 🙂

🔥2514👍5

2 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈5,390 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Можно бесконечно скальпить, а можно взять нормально одной сделкой 📈 Выбор подхода зависит от вашего психотипа и времени, которое готовы уделять рынку 🕯 Я для себя выбрал более лайтовый подход. Ведь зачем мне трейдинг, если тут нужно будет оставлять времени больше чем на «заводе»?

49👍44🔥292

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bittraders111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 343,319 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BIT Traders” (@bittraders111), 5,886 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bittraders111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.