July is behind us. The year is NOT over yet. 🍂 Markets were choppy, volatility spiked — but our AI didn’t flinch. While others panicked, we stayed disciplined. 📊 YTD 2026 (first half results, verified): — JUGG 1x → +29.88%% — LYNX 3x → +44,6% — VORTEX 5x → +58,9% — SPARK 10x → +13.7% All strategies in strong double‑digit green — despite BTC being down -34% this year. July was a consolidation phase. We used it to…

Channel
BITRONIX | A Hedge Fund in Your Phone
@bitronixapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24,438subscribers
-191 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002424081626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitronixapp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitronixapp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 24,438 | -29 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 24,467 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:29 | 24,481 | -51 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 24,532 | -42 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 24,574 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 24,602 | -27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 24,629 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 24,629 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.225%
- avg views ÷ 24,438 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 55.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (31 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 55s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀 BITRONIX: Up +116% YTD While Bitcoin Crashed -34% 2026 has been brutal for Bitcoin. But while BTC bled -34% year-to-date, our AI bots quietly delivered historic returns. 🔥 June 2026 MTD: · JUGG x1: +13.5% · LYNX x3: +36% · VORTEX x5: +62.1% · SPARK x10: +116.6% 📊 YTD 2026 (vs. BTC -34%): · JUGG x1 → +24.4% · LYNX x3 → +56.2% · VORTEX x5 → +80.9% · SPARK x10 → +54.6% Let that sink in. Every single strategy is …
📊 TRADING SIGNAL: STRONG LONG BUILD-UP ON ETH, BTC Bots sharply increased long positions on ETH and BTC. This confirms a strong uptrend. 📈 Current positions: • JUGG 1X: ETH +60%| BTC 0% • LYNX 3X: ETH +60%| BTC +34% • VORTEX 5X: ETH +60%| BTC +34% • SPARK 10X: ETH +60%| BTC +34% 🔍 What does this mean? Algorithms are synchronously increasing long exposure, showing high confidence in trend continuation. This is a lo…
🔥 BITRONIX: Iran deal = crypto ignition! Our algos went LONG overnight – hop on the trend! Good day, traders! While the world cheers the historic Iran agreement, Bitcoin and Ethereum are sitting on extreme oversold levels. Coiled springs ready to snap upward. 📡 What did BITRONIX do? Our AI-powered systems opened LONG positions overnight at 38% of their max limits. Not full risk – but enough to catch the wave. And t…
🚀 BITRONIX: June 2026 is breaking records! EU license, AI algorithms & cosmic returns Good day, everyone! Only 9 days of June — and our bots are already delivering returns that many funds can’t achieve in a year. This is not hype, it’s math, machine learning, and 4+ years of verified track record. 📈 MTD (June 1 – June 9, 2026) Strategy |Leverage |Return JUGG 1x |1x |+12.49% LYNX 3x |3x |+37.21% VORTEX 5x |5x |+67.…
📊 TRADING SIGNAL: LONG POSITIONS REDUCED — PROFIT TAKING Bots are trimming long positions on ETH after the recent rally, locking in profits. Minimal longs on BTC. 📈 Current positions: 🔹 JUGG 1X: ETH -25% | BTC 0% 🔹 LYNX 3X: ETH -26% | BTC -18% 🔹 VORTEX 5X: ETH -26% | BTC -19% 🔹 SPARK 10X: ETH -25% | BTC -21% 🔍 What it means: Algorithms are taking profits and reducing exposure after a rally. 💡 Reminder: Algorithm …
📊 RESULTS THAT SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES Markets evolve, strategies improve, and Bitronix keeps leading. Even during volatile periods, our algorithms deliver impressive results 👇 📈 Q1 2025 → Q1 2026 returns (Jan–Mar): 🔹 JUGG: +4.4% → +20.9% 🔹 LINX: +11.8% → +63.9% 🔹 VORTEX: +17.6% → +98.6% 🔹 SPARK: +23.6% → +165.8% 🚀 Year‑over‑year growth: 🔹 JUGG: ×4.8 🔹 LINX: ×5.4 🔹 VORTEX: ×5.6 🔹 SPARK: ×7 💡 Why it matters: Bitronix…
📌 REMINDER: STABILITY IS THE NEW CURRENCY OF TRUST 🔈 In 2026, crypto isn’t just about “buy the dip” or “moon shots” anymore. It’s shifting toward structural growth, institutional flows, and resilient market infrastructure—seen in how major players are entering and shaping the space. 💡 Bitronix strategies are built for this environment: — where capital seeks consistency over noise — where automation and risk control…
📌 REMINDER: ACT NOW, NOT LATER 🔈 You think: "The market isn’t right… I’ll wait." The algorithm thinks: "Opportunity spotted — I act." 💡 Bitronix doesn’t hesitate. It doesn’t chase hype. It uses every moment to analyze, rebalance, and grow your capital. 📊 Real results, March 2026: 🔹 LINX +81.2% 🔹 VORTEX +145.7% 🔹 SPARK +310.5% 💡 While you’re thinking, algorithms are already working. Discipline and strategy always …
Solar: Capitalize on the SOL Trend with High Leverage 📈 Bitronix Solar bot executes trades on SOLANA perpetual futures with leverage up to 12x, targeting potential annualized volatility of 500%. 🚀 This solution is designed for professional traders seeking to maximize short-term gains within a robust SOL trend. 💡 ⚠️ Important Considerations: ✅ Establish stop-loss and take-profit parameters ✅ Monitor performance dil…
🤫 SILENCE BEFORE THE MOVE This week we shared March results. Even during a corrective month, Bitronix strategies preserved capital and remain strongly in the green year‑to‑date: SPARK +165%, VORTEX +98%, LINX +64%, JUGG +21%. The system works, even when the market goes quiet. 👀 Now — just watch. 💡 Bitronix trend strategies are built for strong moves. In sideways markets, they don’t earn — they wait. Trying to sque…
🚀 FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: STOP LEARNING, START EARNING We’ve talked a lot about sideways markets, drawdowns, discipline, and patience. All of that was for one purpose: to get you ready to act. 💡 And March results proved: theory works. Even during a corrective month, strategies preserved capital, and year‑to‑date numbers remain strong. This is not luck — it’s systematic work. ⌛️ Now — time for practice. Just apply…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bitronixapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 144,129 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Airdropinvestor · 20,8515 postsAirdrop rewards
@airdroprewad · 16,8675 postsAirdrop DAILY
@Quick_profit_123 · 15,0885 postsSol. eth.Ton Bsc all ☎️
@airdropdailygm12 · 6,6242 postsBSC_Coins_Presale
@BSC_Coins_Presale · 4,1722 posts💱 Private investors 📶
@investorsPrivate · 4,3542 posts🔥LivePresale
@LivePresale · 5,3022 posts🦈 Shark Presale 🦈
@SharkPresale0 · 4,2062 postsCRYPTO_MONSTER_CALL Sol / ETH
@airdropdailygm1 · 1,3961 postBABY SOLANAH CALLS
@BABY_SOLANAH_CALLS · 1,1261 postФИНАНСЫ НА ПАЛЬЦАХ
@finance_forkid · 2,0051 postBright Star
@modern_airdrop · 7391 postPump Promo
@pump_promo · 3,7411 postSuperstar
@Superstar146 · 8561 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bitronixapp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 57 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BITRONIX | A Hedge Fund in Your Phone” (@bitronixapp), 24,438 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitronixapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.