Channel
@bitpul
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,148subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001438847018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitpul |
| Description | کانال تخصصی تحلیل مارکت کریپتو کارنسی گروه عمومی بیتپول👈 برای عضویت پیام دهید ربات بیتپول👈 @bitpul_bot ارتباط با من @amirabbasja |
| Created | 1 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitpul |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,148 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,148 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
به قول مارک تواین، تاریخ خودشو عینا تکرار نمیکنه ولی ریتمش رو میزنه (History Doesn't Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes). همین چارت ساده، همین مقایسه اتفاقی که تو هالوینگ های قبلی افتاد با هالوینگ فعلی، میتونست کف بیت رو با دقت خیلی خوبی تشخیص بده. با نزدیک شدن هالوینگ جدید، خواستم یه رفرنسی به این پست داده باشم. توجه کنید که با نورمالایز کردن کندل های قبلی، لوکال تاپ بیت بالای ۵۰ هزار هست. 🔸@Bitpul
Signed amirAbbas J
مقایسه روند بیتکوین در هر سایکل: هر هالوینگ تقریبا 4 سال طول میکشه و الان تقریبا 2 سال تا هالوینگ بعدی مونده. اگر مدت باقی مونده رو با چارت بیتکوین در هالوینگ های متناظر قبلی پر کنیم به چارت جالبی میرسیم. البته باید گفت بخاطر اختلاف قیمتی بیتکوین در سایکل های مختلف، داده های سمت راست چارت رو نورمالایز کردم. از خط عمودی سیاه به سمت راست، داده های هالوینگ قبلی هست که در ضریبی ضرب شدن. چارت بالا برای هالوینگ اول و چا…
Signed amirAbbas J
https://twitter.com/wolfCryptoThe/status/1517800504272728064?s=20&t=nwIArUSD9-EeX7w4Ptu8Bw این توییت برای چند هفته قبله و دقیقا به همین اتفاقی که الان داره میوفته اشاره کردم. هیچ کس نمیتونه این انتظار رو داشته باشه که بازار هرچی دلار چاپ میکنه رو بخره. چاپ پول تقریبا تو هر کانتکست ای بده و آخرش میشه این کثافت کاری هایی که داریم الان میبینیمش. همین الان که دارم مینویسم دلار ترا شده ۵۰ سنت، تتر هم ۵~۶ درصد ارزششو ا…
Signed amirAbbas J
هم اکنون تتر، 10 درصد از ارزش خودش رو نسبت به USDC از دست داده 🔸@Bitpul
Signed amirAbbas J
استیبل UST رو زدن زمین. الانم نوبت تتر شده علی الظاهر. 🔸@Bitpul
Signed amirAbbas J
اگه فکر میکنید لونای تک رقمی ارزشمنده و خواستین بخریدش به این محاسبات سرانگشتی توجه کنید: مارکت کپ کل UST قبل دامپ 16 ملیارد دلار بوده تقریبا. الان رو قیمت 40 سنت، مارکت کپ اش 7 ملیارد دلاره. با فرض ثابت بودن ساپلای UST تو این بازه، حدودا 9 ملیارد دلار باید تزریق بشه. طبق مکانیزم فعلی لونا، و با فرض این که همه 1.4 ملیارد دلار بیتکوین شون رو تا امروز به UST تزریق کرده باشن، بنیاد لونا باید 9 ملیارد دلار لونا تو بازا…
Signed amirAbbas J
به قول مرحوم شکسپیر: "These violent delights have violent ends" "این خوشی های تند، پایان های دردناکی هم به همراه دارن" اون سیستم مالی که رو سپرده UST کاربراش سود ۲۰ درصد میده، و بعدش به این هم اکتفا نمیکنه و برای باد کردن بیشتر حباب UST و ۱۰۰ دلاری کردن توکن لونا، یه پروژه دیگه بالا میاره که مردم بتونن پول قرض کنن و با اهرم سپرده گذاری کنن (که مثلا با استیک کردن استیبل کوین با لورج ۵، آخر سال ۱۰۰٪ بهره بگیری) باید…
Signed amirAbbas J
میدونید لونا چطور کار میکنه؟ UST یه استیبل کوین الگوریتمی هست و به دلار آمریکا پگ شده و همیشه ارزشش برابر با 1 دلاره. حالا اگه USDT بیاد زیر 1 دلار، بنیاد لونا باید اونقدر USDT بخره تا دوباره ارزشش برگرده 1 دلار. این کار رو از کجا تامین مالی میکنه؟ از فروش توکن های لونا تو بازار آزاد. اگه بنا رو بگیریم که UST برمیگرده به پگ اش باید انتظار دراپ بیشتر تو لونا رو داشته باشیم نه؟ پ.ن. UST کم کم داشت میرفت تا پشتوانه ش…
Signed amirAbbas J
شاهد این لحظه تاریخی باشید جدا شدن پگ UST از دلار آمریکا! البته هیچ اتفاقی نمیافته و برمیگرده سر جاش ولی این نشانه هایی از نشتی هایی تو سیستم فعلی استیبل کوین ها هست. تقریبا همه استیبل کوین های فعلی بدون پشتوانه هستن همین اتفاق میتونه سر USDT و USDC بیاد 🔸@Bitpul
Signed amirAbbas J
سلام. عیدتون مبارک. بهترین هارو براتون آرزو میکنم. امروز به رشته توییتی از یکی از "خفن" ترین افرادی که میشناسم برخوردم. حیفم اومد اینجا شیر اش نکنم. متاسفانه نمیتونم این توییت رو ترجمه کنم. میتونید از وبسایت زیر برای ترجمه توییت استفاده کنید [گوگل ترنسلیت] How to Get Rich (without getting lucky): Seek wealth, not money or status. Wealth is having assets that earn while you sleep. Money is how we transfer time and…
Signed amirAbbas J
Work as hard as you can. Even though who you work with and what you work on are more important than how hard you work. Become the best in the world at what you do. Keep redefining what you do until this is true. There are no get rich quick schemes. That's just someone else getting rich off you. Apply specific knowledge, with leverage, and eventually you will get what you deserve. When you're finally wealthy, you'…
Signed amirAbbas J
@Bitpul
Signed amirAbbas J
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bitpul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بنظر شما مطلب بالا گزاره درستی هست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2021 to 27 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 216,620 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BITPUL بیتپول” (@bitpul), 1,148 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitpul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.