This is the replay of that $26k W https://x.com/metawin/status/1981389078646956340?s=46&t=WrHBxP1bwPxxH7gdrbZZLA
❤4

Channel
@bitcoinnbabyy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,880subscribers
-154 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002295833330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitcoinnbabyy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitcoinnbabyy |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 3,880 | -21 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 3,901 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 3,914 | -27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 3,941 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 3,949 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 3,963 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 3,975 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 3,994 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 4,005 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 4,019 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 4,026 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 4,033 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 4,034 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 4,034 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 56.8% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 9.47% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 23 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is the replay of that $26k W https://x.com/metawin/status/1981389078646956340?s=46&t=WrHBxP1bwPxxH7gdrbZZLA
❤4
If you guys didn’t see, MetaWin just announced they’re currently running at 0% house edge. AND you still earn their crazy rewards + a guaranteed $CASINO airdrop when they TGE. So you have full blown +EV gambling right now. Which means you have the opportunity to turn $12 into $26k like this guy today. While playing games with 0% house edge & earning a guaranteed airdrop. There has never been a better time to have …
🤨3❤1
63bpnCja1pGB2HSazkS8FAPAUkYgcXoDwYHfvZZveBot
$BOT is looking good rn…👀 I’m locked & loaded✌🏼💸 https://dexscreener.com/solana/8N5VS5aSyqxrkVL73K9m6hvtkZWmEuBsdkzQL2Mbddy4
❤6🔥2👍1
This is the replay of his win https://x.com/metawin/status/1978491203466272850?s=46&t=WrHBxP1bwPxxH7gdrbZZLA
❤2
This guy who signed up yesterday just turned $2.50 into $27k on MetaWin The crazy part is he also gets a guaranteed $CASINO airdrop & probably 4 figures in rewards MetaWin’s new rewards scheme is insane, they just drop $$ in your wallet every 30 minutes If you guys still haven’t, go make an account & take advantage of the upside while it lasts. They’re making a push to become the biggest crypto casino rn, they won…
❤5
🔔Notification check🔔 Who’s active & ready to PRINT?!!!??? Big alpha coming soon. You don’t want to miss this.
🔥11❤6👍5
Picked up some $GRODT (Get Rich or Die Trying) at $5M Hearing big things, lots of hype around this narrative. We ALL want to get rich—and we will die trying. That’s why we’re here. $GRODT gives people something to believe in and I can see this community sending this project far. NFA. DYOR Ca: 6V4QLouv2HTbae34hBjLgW5Qc3kdquqFLBsDS3scR1CH
🤔4❤2🔥2
This is the replay of the win https://x.com/metawin/status/1970505855742132292?s=46&t=WrHBxP1bwPxxH7gdrbZZLA
❤3
Wow I just watched somebody hit a literal 10,000X He turned $35 into $350k just now playing on MetaWin. This is exactly why I’ve been saying you need to be on MetaWin farming this $CASINO airdrop. Every-time you wager on their site rn you’re not only earning a guaranteed airdrop… You have a chance at hitting an insane win like this guy. On top of that they have a $1.3M leaderboard that will be distributed amongst …
❤4
Picked up a bag of $LOL on $SOL 💰🚀 CA (TAP TO COPY👇) BJQ6hnAoGreu9kh74fiezxnk8wDP2MVgnmdQtdjSxDog
❤4🔥3
Watching a casino play rn👀
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bitcoinnbabyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BitcoinBaby’s Money Moves” (@bitcoinnbabyy), 3,880 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcoinnbabyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.