Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net +717. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 16:23
857
no change
2 Oct 2026, 07:55
857
+722
16 Sept 2026, 17:38
135
+3
8 Sept 2026, 16:00
132
-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:54
134
-3
21 Aug 2026, 20:06
137
-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:18
139
-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:25
140
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 857 subscribers
Avg views / post
291
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
20 (17 September 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
4,941
Reactions total
106
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
28
Videos
4
Links
24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
106 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
51
48.1%
🔥
38
35.8%
👍
11
10.4%
❤🔥
4
3.77%
👏
1
0.943%
🥰
1
0.943%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👍 Congratulations to Our Winners!
We’re pleased to announce that all rewards have now been successfully distributed to our three lucky winners.
🏆 Congratulations to all the winners!
Thank you for taking part in the BTCLE Community Feedback Giveaway and for sharing your valuable feedback with us.
We truly appreciate everyone who participated and supported the BTCLE community.
👍 Zealy Sprint is now LIVE!
Join the …
❤️The BTCLE Zealy Sprint is now live.👍
For the next 28 days, our Zealy campaign remains open to the entire community. The structure is simple. Complete the quests, build your XP, and the final leaderboard decides where you land.
This is how BTCLE recognizes its community. Not through private allocations or hidden advantages, but through visible, verifiable contributions that anyone can see and anyone can earn.
💲 P…
⬆️ BTCLE Community Feedback Giveaway — Winners Announcement
Hello BTCLE Family,
The moment you've been waiting for is finally here. We've gone through all your genuine feedback, and we truly appreciate every single response. Now it's time to reveal our lucky winners.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
$30 Community Feedback Giveaway Winners
Three lucky winners will each receive $10.
🪙CoinMarketCap Winner
defi_verse30
✖️X (Tw…
❤️ The best holders are not the ones who react fastest. They are the ones who understand what they hold.
👀Short-term traders watch the price every hour. 🔼Long-term holders understand the supply, the design, and the reason a project exists. That understanding is what keeps them steady when the market gets loud.
$BTCLE⬆️ is built for that mindset. Fixed supply, transparent structure, and a foundation meant to be unde…
🎁 $30 Community Feedback Giveaway
We want your honest opinion on our latest posts!
3 winners will receive $10 each — $30 in total.
How to participate✔️
To be eligible, you must complete the tasks on ALL 3 platforms:
1️⃣ Coinmarketcap
• Leave your best and most genuine comment
• Share your honest feedback
2️⃣ X (Twitter)
• Follow our account
• Comment on the post
• Quote the post with your genuine thoughts
• Boo…
❤️ The word transparent gets used loosely in crypto. Here is a simple test.
🔍Reported transparency is when a team tells you what is happening.
On-chain transparency is when the blockchain shows you, whether the team likes it or not.
One asks for trust. The other removes the need for it.
$BTCLE is built for the second kind. Public contract address, on-chain vesting, and scheduled releases anyone can verify in real …
❤️ A vesting schedule tells you more about a project than most marketing ever will.
🔒It shows when locked tokens enter the market, how fast, and whether the team planned for stability or a quick exit. If you cannot find it, that is your answer.
⬆️$BTCLE runs a declining monthly release across ten years, from 2027 to 2036, handled entirely by an on-chain smart contract. Larger early, smaller over time, fully verifia…
❤️ What a project refuses says more than what it promises.
Refusing inside allocations. Refusing paid listings. Refusing free tokens handed out for hype. These are not small choices. They shape everything that comes after them.
⬆️BTCLE was built on a set of quiet refusals. No shortcuts. No favors. No noise bought with tokens.
Promises show the ambition. Refusals show the values.
Read both before you decide.
Foll…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bitcoinlimitededition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Limited Edition official” (@bitcoinlimitededition), 857 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcoinlimitededition.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.