Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BitOpex Announcement Channel

@bitOpexchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,701subscribers

-154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788427715
TypeChannel
Username@bitOpexchannel
DescriptionBitOpex - the ultimate crypto options exchange. Website🌐: https://bitopex.io Linktree: https://linktr.ee/bitopexio
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bitOpexchannel

Growth

18,70118,85518,7786 August 2026 — 18,855 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,832 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,804 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,775 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,752 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,701 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,678–18,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:1418,701-21
12 Aug 2026, 02:0218,722-30
11 Aug 2026, 00:5518,752-23
9 Aug 2026, 21:5418,775-29
8 Aug 2026, 19:2118,804-28
7 Aug 2026, 16:2818,832-23
6 Aug 2026, 19:1718,855first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.23%
avg views ÷ 18,701 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held22 (21 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,219
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
477
Videos
185
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
952.9%
👏529.4%
🔥211.8%
👍15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👀 Ever looked at a quiet options market and thought: “Calls are cheap. So buying them must be a good trade.” But there’s a catch: A cheap option still needs enough movement, soon enough. If price barely moves, theta keeps taking value away. If volatility stays low, there may be no IV boost to help either. Before buying a call, ask three things: • How much movement is already priced in? • How much time do I have?

1

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC157 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | What Options Traders Should Watch 👀Bitcoin holds strong above key supportBTC defended critical levels as ETF outflows slowed, keeping traders focused on breakout risk and volatility expansion. 👀Massive options expiries reset positioningOver $6B in BTC and ETH options expired, shifting open interest and clearing space for fresh volatility setups. 👀Implied volatility stays elevatedOptions mar

1

6 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC242 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

New video is up. July closed at 2.1% on the Bitcoin vault and 3.4% on the altcoin one. Best month since April, and the market gave up almost nothing this month. Also in there: why Bitcoin is stuck in the same range it has been in since June, why Solana's volume is basically gone, and the two calls I sold this week (ETH 2k, SOL 78). Last week @evinho0x said HYPE was going under 55. It went to 50. https://x.com/Bit

1👏1

1 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC234 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👀Ever predicted the move correctly and still lost money? That was my first real lesson in volatility crush. A trader buys a $BTC call before a major event. The price rises after the news, just as expected. Yet the option drops. What happened? Before the event, traders expected a large move. That expectation pushed implied volatility higher and made the option expensive. Once the news arrived, uncertainty disappe

30 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC209 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | What Traders Should Watch 📰Fed risk keeps BTC pinned near $63K Bitcoin is holding close to $63,000 as traders wait for the July Fed decision. For options desks, this is less about spot direction and more about how fast volatility reprices after the statement. 📰ETF flows turn choppy again BTC and ETH ETF flows are no longer giving a clean signal. That matters, since flow reversals can turn qu

28 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC195 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Weekly Macro Events to Watch 🚨 Several key events could shape the direction of $BTC & ETH this week: 🏦 Wed | 8:00 PM CEST FOMC Rate Decision Expected: Rates unchanged (3.50%–3.75%) • Hawkish outcome → Crypto negative 📉 • Dovish outcome → Crypto positive 📈 🎤 Wed | 8:30 PM CEST Fed Chair Warsh Press Conference Expected: Cautious, data-dependent tone • Hawkish comments → Crypto negative • Dovish comments → Crypto p

25 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC224 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ever watched $BTC move 5% and realized your position had no brakes? That is where options earn their place. A call can give you upside exposure with a fixed premium. A put can protect against a sharp drop. A spread can lower the entry cost, though it caps the payout. The point is not to predict every move. The point is to know your maximum loss before the market decides for you.

23 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC243 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Weekly crypto news from Bitopex 📰 BTC and ETH sentiment stays defensive Bitcoin and ether traders are still paying up for downside protection, with one-week BTC put-call skew recently near 16%, showing demand for puts remains strong. 📰 ETF flows remain the swing factor Citi cut its BTC and ETH targets after ETF demand weakened, with bitcoin ETF flows down about $3.3B year-to-date in its latest note. 📰 Bitcoin opti

20 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC256 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Tokenized assets are starting to show up inside crypto market structure. In today's video, @0xEvinho covers: - BTC around $64,403 and higher highs from $57.8K - ETH around $1,866 with resistance near $1,900 - HYPE losing momentum with a possible $55-$56 test - SOL waiting for broader market momentum - RWA assets appearing on liquidation heat maps - An ETH $2K call sold for Jul 24 - Bitopex copy trading returns: BTC

👏1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC224 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📊 Weekly Crypto Recap A green week, but not a clean one 👇 • BTC: +1.6% • ETH: +3.6% • SOL: -0.9% • XRP: +1.1% ETH led the group after holding the $1,800 area. BTC pushed higher but remains capped near $65.1k, XRP stayed firm, and SOL still looks trapped below $78. Outlook for this week: Buyers have a slight edge, but resistance sits close. Expected volatility: • BTC: ~4.5% • ETH: ~6% • SOL: ~7% The key signal is $

20 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC198 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

I once chose the cheapest option on the screen. It expired three days later... The direction was right. The trade still lost ⛔️ An expiry date is not a small detail. It decides how long your idea has to work and how quickly time value disappears. Short-dated options cost less, but the clock moves fast. A small delay can hurt the position, even when $BTC later moves in the expected direction. Longer-dated options

👏1

17 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC397 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Copytrading results, tracked in real time 📊 🔶0DTE Bitcoin $BTC Strategy +58.44% ROI/year +125.05% total P&L 🔷ALT-0DTE Strategy +29.99% ROI/year +21.28% total P&L ▶️Review the data, compare the strategies, and decide what fits your approach. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @bitOpexchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 144,153 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BitOpex Announcement Channel” (@bitOpexchannel), 18,701 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitOpexchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.