4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,745–1,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:34
1,745
-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:00
1,746
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:15
1,747
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:30
1,747
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.1%
avg views ÷ 1,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
910
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (14 June 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
7,276
Reactions total
139
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
333 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
148
44.4%
🙏
101
30.3%
🔥
36
10.8%
😢
26
7.81%
👏
11
3.30%
✍
6
1.80%
🤔
3
0.901%
👎
1
0.3%
😁
1
0.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pentru că scriu în românește și sunt citit de români, întrebarea va fi despre BOR și România. CE PĂRERE AVEȚI DESPRE DRAPELUL NAȚIONAL ȘI ALTE SIMBOLURI NAȚIONALE ÎN BISERICĂ?
1. Cred că tricolorul trebuie să rămână în biserică, iar unde lipsește să fie pus12%
2. În diaspora el trebuie dublat de drapelul țării gazdă8%
3. Chiar și în diaspora BOR trebuie să-și păstreze identitatea exclusiv românească8%
4. Drapelul trebuie scos din lăcașurile de cult, dar poate rămâne în alte instituții bisericești33%
5. Drapelul trebuie scos din orice instituție bisericească, dar să păstrăm educația patriotică12%
6. Trebuie să dispară orice simbol național din Biserică, inclusiv semnele de carte tricolore19%
7. Nu consider că BOR suferă de etnofiletism, ba chiar ar trebui mai mult naționalism9%
8. Consider că BOR este grav afectată de naționalism și trebuie să schimbe abordarea27%
9. Ierarhii trebuie să îndrepte anumite cazuri izolate, dar în general nu văd probleme20%
Un alt răspuns. Îl scriu în comentariu sub această postare5%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Văzând cum, mai ales în ultima vreme, unii și alții alunecă spre etnofiletism și ajung să creadă că neamul sau țara lor ar constitui „ultimul bastion al Ortodoxiei”, m-am hotărât să aștern câteva gânduri pe această temă. Le puteți citi și chiar comenta, dacă aveți observații care țin de subiect.
Textul nu urmărește să apere o tabără și să condamne alta, nici să alimenteze polemici sterile, ci să ne ajute să privim di…
De la 1 ianuarie 2027, în Portugalia (dar și în multe alte țări UE), adolescenții de până la clasa a IX-a nu vor putea folosi smartphone-ul în școală, iar instalarea anumitor rețele sociale și jocuri pe dispozitivele de acasă va fi restricționată.
Până acum restricția funcționa până la clasa V-a, iar în această primăvară a fost extinsă până la clasa a VII-a, deși, după datele Ministerului Educației, regula a fost res…
Așa cum orice plantă se ofilește fără apă, tot așa se ofilește și sufletul omului care nu se roagă.
Apa de care are nevoie sufletul este apa cea vie pe care Hristos a promis că o va da femeii samarinence. Ea este harul Duhului Sfânt care satură setea spirituală a omului.
🖋️ Sfântul Luca al Crimeii
Câteva meditații DESPRE ÎNCREDEREA FĂRĂ NAIVITATE ȘI CERCETAREA FĂRĂ BĂNUIALĂ:
https://www.teologie.net/2026/07/28/despre-increderea-fara-naivitate-si-cercetarea-fara-banuiala/
Mulți preoți, mai ales din România, mă întreabă frecvent despre EPITIMIILE PENTRU CONTRACEPŢIE şi alte lucruri de genul acesta. Mi-a luat destul timp să studiez documentele, opiniile teologice și datele medicale disponibile (şi inteligibile pentru omul de rând), pentru a formula cât mai prudent un punct de vedere asupra unei teme pe care Biserica Ortodoxă, la nivel panortodox, încă nu a definit-o în mod unitar.
Prin…
O explicaţie liturgică necesară, mai ales că neînţelegerea acestei probleme îi atinge inclusiv pe unii episcopi, nu doar pe preoţi. Să vă fie de folos. https://www.teologie.net/2026/07/10/hristos-potir-prezent-permanent/
Răspuns la o întrebare liturgică: https://www.teologie.net/2026/07/09/despre-ectenia-de-dupa-anafora-pentru-cinstitele-daruri-ce-s-au-adus-si-s-au-sfintit/
În perioada posturilor, deseori apare întrebarea: „Este permisă sau nu intimitatea conjugală în timpul postului?” „Care este poziția Bisericii cu privire la această problemă?”
Răspuns:
Atât cei care susțin, cât și cei care se opun intimității conjugale în timpul postului citează de obicei acel pasaj din capitolul al șaptelea al Epistolei Întâia către Corinteni, în care Apostolul Pavel îi sfătuie pe cei căsătoriți s…
Pentru cei interesați, am actualizat articolul mai vechi (2014) despre zilele în care se pot sau nu săvârși Cununii: https://www.teologie.net/2014/08/01/cand-nu-se-savarseste-cununia/
🙏10👍4🔥3
Signed Petru Pruteanu
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bispopedro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Pentru că scriu în românește și sunt citit de români, întrebarea va fi despre BOR și România. CE PĂRERE AVEȚI DESPRE DRAPELUL NAȚIONAL ȘI ALTE SIMBOLURI NAȚIONALE ÎN BISERICĂ?
1. Cred că tricolorul trebuie să rămână în biserică, iar unde lipsește să fie pus12%
2. În diaspora el trebuie dublat de drapelul țării gazdă8%
3. Chiar și în diaspora BOR trebuie să-și păstreze identitatea exclusiv românească8%
4. Drapelul trebuie scos din lăcașurile de cult, dar poate rămâne în alte instituții bisericești33%
5. Drapelul trebuie scos din orice instituție bisericească, dar să păstrăm educația patriotică12%
6. Trebuie să dispară orice simbol național din Biserică, inclusiv semnele de carte tricolore19%
7. Nu consider că BOR suferă de etnofiletism, ba chiar ar trebui mai mult naționalism9%
8. Consider că BOR este grav afectată de naționalism și trebuie să schimbe abordarea27%
9. Ierarhii trebuie să îndrepte anumite cazuri izolate, dar în general nu văd probleme20%
Un alt răspuns. Îl scriu în comentariu sub această postare5%
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 303,340 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✝️ PETRU Pruteanu” (@bispopedro), 1,745 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bispopedro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
