Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 67 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 14:47
202
-1
3 Oct 2026, 12:22
203
-1
19 Sept 2026, 05:35
204
+2
10 Sept 2026, 12:40
202
+1
31 Aug 2026, 10:35
201
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:20
202
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:25
202
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3
60.0%
🔥
2
40.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Підсумкові результати👇
🏆 4/4 — Ви справжня легенда граматики. Саме вам колеги довірять перевірити лист перед відправкою. 😎
💪 3/4 — Чудовий результат! Залишилося лише пропрацювати одну слабку сторону.
📚 2/4 — Непогано! Ви вже багато знаєте — продовжуйте практикуватися.
🌱 0–1/4 — Дякуємо, що долучилися! Ці помилки трапляються дуже часто, тож ви точно не одні. 😊
💬 Пишіть у коментарях свій результат і розкажіть, яке за…
📧 5 English phrases for professional emails when things go wrong
1. I'd like to apologise for the delay in getting back to you.
👉 Коли відповідаєте із запізненням.
2. We're currently looking into this and will keep you updated.
👉 Коли проблема ще вирішується, але клієнта потрібно тримати в курсі.
3. We'd like to propose a revised timeline of…
👉 Коли потрібно перенести дедлайн.
4. Please accept our apologies for a…
Your PM sends a message: "We need this feature done ASAP." You reply with a polite but honest update. Which response is grammatically correct and natural?
I work on it since this morning and should finish by 5pm.0%
I am working on it since this morning and will finish by 5pm.0%
I worked on it since this morning and I finish by 5pm.0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔬 Ми знайшли 4 реальні помилки з бізнес-листування та повідомлень у Slack. Чи зможете ви помітити їх до того, як прочитаєте правильний варіант?
ПОМИЛКА 1
❌ Please revert back to me by EOD.
✅ Please revert to me by EOD.
Revert уже означає «повернутися з відповіддю», тому слово back тут зайве.
ПОМИЛКА 2
❌ We need to discuss about the API design.
✅ We need to discuss the API design.
Дієслово discuss вживається без a…
#Functionallanguage
💼 Незалежно від того, чи ви кандидат, техлід або HR-менеджер, ці 5 фраз допоможуть вам почуватися впевнено на співбесіді англійською.
1. That's a great question — let me think about that for a moment.
Це дуже хороше запитання — дайте мені хвилинку подумати.
📌 Коли потрібно виграти кілька секунд, щоб сформулювати відповідь.
❌ Не кажіть просто "Ummm...".
2. In that role, I was responsible for… wh…
#Idiominthewild
📌to be on the same page
Значення: мати однакове розуміння ситуації, володіти тією ж інформацією або бути в згоді щодо певного питання.
✅ Before we start the sprint, let's make sure we're all on the same page about priorities.
✅ Are you and the client on the same page regarding the scope?
Як використовувати в розмові?
Замість сухого або дещо зверхнього:
Do you understand? (Ти зрозумів?)
краще сказ…
#Grammarmythbusted
«Чим формальніше текст, тим довшими мають бути речення»
Міф: професійне спілкування має складатися з довгих і складних речень, щоб звучати більш авторитетно.
Реальність: найефективніша ділова комунікація – це чіткість і лаконічність. Довгі речення приховують головну думку та змушують читача витрачати більше зусиль на розуміння тексту.
❌
In light of the fact that the system has been experiencing…
You're writing a post-mortem report after a production incident. Which sentence is grammatically correct?
The engineer noticed the issue since the alert was triggered at 3am.0%
By the time the team responded, the database had been corrupted for two hours.67%
We should have been investigating the logs before the incident happened.33%
The outage was lasted for 47 minutes before service was restored.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @biscuIT_English. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Your PM sends a message: "We need this feature done ASAP." You reply with a polite but honest update. Which response is grammatically correct and natural?
I work on it since this morning and should finish by 5pm.0%
I am working on it since this morning and will finish by 5pm.0%
I worked on it since this morning and I finish by 5pm.0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
You're writing a post-mortem report after a production incident. Which sentence is grammatically correct?
The engineer noticed the issue since the alert was triggered at 3am.0%
By the time the team responded, the database had been corrupted for two hours.67%
We should have been investigating the logs before the incident happened.33%
The outage was lasted for 47 minutes before service was restored.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“biscuIT.English” (@biscuIT_English), 202 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biscuIT_English.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.