Channel
@bis_kis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
7,277subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690290756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bis_kis |
| Description | 🙋🏻♀️Я - Настя з Харкова💚 🥰На цьому каналі мої бісерні схеми та народні українські узори https://base.monobank.ua/yF6tH3DSVp4Zx |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bis_kis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 7,277 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 7,275 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 7,277 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
582 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 414 | 71.1% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 9.62% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 5.67% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 4.30% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 3.95% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 2.23% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.687% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 0.687% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.515% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.515% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.344% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.172% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.172% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 582reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друуузі! Хто хоче отримати той самий невловимий альбом - напишіть авторці👇👇👇 Можна отримати pdf за донат на ЗСУ, сторінки волонтерів вона скине https://www.facebook.com/HalynaLukianets
❤28❤🔥1
Signed Настя
Отримала книгу про котильони, я в захваті💖 Книга українською, англійською та німецькою мовами. Дуже багато фотографій котильонів, до кожної є підпис про походження, розміри, де зберігається. Зазначено, що більшість котильонів робились з бісеру 11-13 розміру. Схем мало, але всі фото дуже чіткі і якісні - за бажанням все можна відтворити. Посилання на книгу постом вище Запрошую у мій тікток😉 https://www.tiktok.com/@bi…
❤62👏2🔥2🌚1
Signed Настя
Вийшла книга про котильони! https://denvyshyvanky.wayforpay.shop/prod/675414
❤83👍6🔥4
Signed Настя
Почали розсилати😊
❤28🤩3
Signed Настя
Японський бісер Міюкі Деліка🌟💎 Приємні ціни, відправка щодня, є післяплата, оплата на ФОП. https://bisernalavka.com/biser-miyuki-delica/
😍21❤19👍6❤🔥1
Signed Настя
Друзі, вітаю! Вийшла друга частина каталогу зі схемами силянок з колекції Івано-Франківського краєзнавчого музею. Придбати можна тут https://gigshop.com.ua/product/identity-thread-the-oldest-gerdans-catalog/
❤60
Signed Настя
Друзі, вітаю! Вийшла ось така книга. Подивитись та замовити можна на сайті видавництва https://www.alexxgarkusha.com.ua/product-page/скарби-ужгородського-скансену
❤35
Signed Настя
Бісерні схеми Кисиленко Анастасії pinned a photo
Друзі, нова форма шахрайства. Скоріш за все, аккаунт Ірини Лавришин зламаний. Конкурсу такого не існує. Назва одразу в ступор вводить - "замочок", шо? На кнопку "Проголосувати" не тисніть, веде на якийсь лівий фішинговий сайт. В кращому випадку - уведуть ваш телеграм і почнуть розсилати повідомлення всім контактам "Позич до завтра 20000 грн терміново".
🤯23🔥19❤12💯4🙈4👍3😢3☃1
Signed Настя
Скоро вийде книга про котильони✨
❤71👍18❤🔥11🔥9
Signed Настя
Друзі, вітаю! Почалось передзамовлення ось такої книги. За посиланням можна подивитись на деякі сторінки, там є і бісерні прикраси. Із анотації: "У альбомі представлене різноманітне вбрання – натільне, поясне, нагрудне, безрукавне, верхнє, головні убори та прикраси. Проте найбільше уваги приділено вишитим сорочкам, які є осерддям цієї колекції. Це 149 сорочок: жіночих, чоловічих та дитячих, які переважно походять із…
🔥22❤16😍4
Signed Настя
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bis_kis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 663,221 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бісерні схеми Кисиленко Анастасії” (@bis_kis), 7,277 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bis_kis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.