Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 57 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 13:17
40
-1
10 Aug 2026, 18:15
41
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
41
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 26 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17
22.4%
custom 5420178328743073035
12
15.8%
custom 5420593317073146025
10
13.2%
custom 5458908492687497206
10
13.2%
custom 5461151367559141950
7
9.21%
custom 5379659336689661329
6
7.89%
🎉
5
6.58%
👍
4
5.26%
custom 5380005184636204856
3
3.95%
🔥
2
2.63%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2024 to 7 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Выкладываю фото из субботней поездки в Гатчину. Лайферов не было, но получилось много хороших фотографий. На Белом озере очень много птиц, да и в самом Гатчинском парке тоже, но на парк мне уже не хватило времени. Обязательно поеду туда еще как можно скорее!:)
Всем привет! В прошлую субботу я наконец выбрался за птицами - с экскурсией походили по Сосновке. Был снегопад, птиц было мало, в основном на кормушках. Видели трех БПД, две стаи дроздов-рябинников, ястреба-тетеревятника и конечно много синиц. Но сфотографировать успел только БПД. Прилагаю фото БПД) Уже жду весенний пролет птиц!)
Дорогие подписчики! Поздравляю вас с наступающим 2025 годом. В 2024 году я завел этот канал - это очень важное событие для меня. Большое спасибо вам за интерес, реакции и комментарии - для меня это очень важно и ценно. Постараюсь в наступающем году радовать вас интересным контентом. Всем желаю всего наилучшего, весело встретить Новый год и очень много птиц!
💡💡💡💡💡💡
Фото со вчерашней поездки на Елагин: был ураган, пти…
Всем привет! В субботу я был на стрелке Васильевского острова: там плавают три синьги среди компании чаек, за ними я и поехал. Они плавают относительно недалеко от берега, и шумные туристы, а также выстрелы пушки на Петропавловской крепости их совсем не смущают) Свет был не очень, но пофотографировал и опробовал свой штатив - с ним удобно! Выкладываю фото птиц и пару фоток центра:)
Всем привет! Сегодня у меня был очень удачный день! Я поехал в парк Городов - героев за самцом мандаринки и самкой широконоски. Как только мы приехали в парк, мы сразу увидели много галок и грачей - вообще в Петербурге не очень много галок, и редко можно их встретить в таком количестве в обычном городском парке. Затем мы пошли к пруду, и там среди крякв были мандаринка и широконоска! Так что с двумя лайферами меня 🎉 …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @birdwatchertales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рассказы бёрдвотчера” (@birdwatchertales), 40 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birdwatchertales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.