Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bird Life

Channel

Bird Life

@birdlifeclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,777subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001659770040
TypeChannel
Username@birdlifeclub
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/birdlifeclub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7771,7981,787.57 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,786 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,781 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,777 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,774–1,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:401,777-4
5 Sept 2026, 13:011,781-7
29 Aug 2026, 05:331,788-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:151,789-9
23 Aug 2026, 05:031,798+3
19 Aug 2026, 13:141,795+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:431,794+6
13 Aug 2026, 12:481,788+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:221,786-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:481,789no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:071,789first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

968 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48049.6%
🔥30231.2%
👍9810.1%
❤‍🔥373.82%
🥰171.76%
🍾101.03%
👏60.62%
🤩50.517%
🤪50.517%
😍40.413%
🙈40.413%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 968 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC195 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Такой разный Алтай.

31🔥12👍9

Signed Геннадий Колотин

6 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC337 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

День шестой нашей птичьей поездки по Горному Алтаю мы провели на озере Киндыктыкуль и прилегающих ущельях. Это волшебное место и уехать из него без крутых птиц и кадров - невозможно. Мы хорошо поснимали горных вьюрков, белых и тундровых куропаток и других высокогорных птиц. Но сил совсем нет разбирать фото, а завтра снова чуть свет в новую локацию. Поэтому покажу вам фото из предыдущего дня- берёг для подходящего слу

45🔥44❤‍🔥5🙈4🥰1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC376 views105 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

День пятый нашего тура в Горном. Сегодня мы искали птиц каменистых пустынь. Главной целью была саджа - очень интересная и необычная птица для России. Мы справились!

59🔥31👏6🤩5🍾2❤‍🔥1🥰1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

5 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC429 views134 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не птичками едиными)) Корсак. Горный Алтай '26

68🔥39👍21🥰5❤‍🔥1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

4 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC445 views138 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

День четвертый нашей птичьей поездки по Алтаю мы провели на границе с Монголией. Птиц в целом было немного - скорее всего из-за жары. Но удалось несколько раз встретить и очень хорошо поснимать величественных алтайских соколов! Балобан.

🔥6553👍11🤪5🥰3❤‍🔥1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

3 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC475 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

День третий нашего птичьего тура в Горном. Начали мы его на Уланском перевале, где поснимали полярных овсянок, северного сорокопута, орлов - карликов, синехвосток, горбоносых турпанов и оляпок. После обеда по плану был перегон в Кош-Агач. И в Курайской степи нас нагнала непогода: штормовой ветер, сдувающий с ног, стена дождя и града, за которой не видно было ничего, что дальше 15 метров. А за пару часов до заката уже

58🔥37👍13❤‍🔥7🥰2🍾1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

3 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC502 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Такой разный Алтай.

🔥4833👍12🥰3

Signed Геннадий Колотин

2 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC526 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

День второй нашей поездки в Горном Алтае. Пришлось наверстывать за первый день. Что мы практически и сделали, буквально за исключением пары видов, которые оставили на обратный путь. Сегодня нас порадовали хищники, а больше всех вот этот красавец. Сапсан.

69❤‍🔥21👍11🔥7🍾5🥰2

Signed Геннадий Колотин

2 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC612 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро с Семинского перевала. Горный Алтай.

64👍21🔥19😍4🍾2❤‍🔥1

Signed Геннадий Колотин

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @birdlifeclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bird Life” (@birdlifeclub), 1,777 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birdlifeclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.