Channel
@bioqio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,411subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001550527138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bioqio |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bioqio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 2,411 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 2,413 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 2,428 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 2,432 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 2,432 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,448 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
39 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 89.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لزوماً نیازی نیست که زیستشناس باشی تا بتوانی کرمها و پروانهها را از هم بازشناسی اما انسانشناس کە باشی اغلب میتوانی کرمها و پروانهها را میان آدمیان تشخیص دهی. علاوه بر آن خیلی مهم است که بدانی گرچه کمی از کرمها به پروانه دگردیس میگردند اما مهمتر از آن این کە هر کرمی به هیچوجه پروانه نخواهد گشت! نتيجه این که امید بستن به پروانه شدنِ بعضی از کرمها (چه از میان حیوانها و چه از میان انسانها) جز خیالبافی چی…
ویلیام شکسپیر (William Shakespeare) شاعر و نمایشنامهنویس انگلستانی: The hell is empty and all the devils are here . جهنم خالی است و همه شیاطین اینجا هستند. ⚠️توجه: ارائه این مطلب به منزله موافقت صد درصدی بنده با این شخص و همه نظرات و آثار وی نمی باشد! @Han_Pen
گر به کثیر حیوانها محبت کنی آنها را رام بینی، گر به کثیر انسانها محبت کنی آنها را هار بینی! عالَمِ عجایب است، عجیب در عجبم در عجب... 📝 م. محمدنژاد @Han_Pen
👏1
نفرینِ خدا بر بدان باد که با بدیِ خود، خوبان را ز خوبیِ خود مأیوس و پشیمان میگردانند... 📝 م. محمدنژاد @Han_Pen
👍1
Sadism
حدود پنج سال پیش به خاطر طعنه هایی که از دوست و دشمن پس از انتشار یک ویدیو از خودم درمورد گل قهر و آشتی در صفحه اینستاگرامم دريافت نمودم، بارها از خودم پرسیدم که آیا واقعاً اشتباه سترگی در کار من است که این سخنان پوچ و مهمل را نثار حالم میکنند؟ بنابراین پس از تحقیق و تفکر، اقدام به تهیه و نشر یک فایل ویدیویی کردم و در آن سعی کردم به این سؤال پاسخ دهم که چرا این افراد با من چنین رفتاری انجام دادند؟ حال بنا به دلا…
❤1
سادیسم مقدمه: سادیسم عبارت است از علاقه به آزار دادن دیگران به صورت جسمی، روانی و جنسی به طوری که این آزار رساندن موجب لذت و آرامشِ فردِ آزاررسان شود! این افراد از تحقیر و تمسخر و آزارِ روحی ، جسمی و جنسی انسانها به خصوص در حضور دیگران لذت زیادی میبرند و گاهی رفتار های پرخاشگرانه یا جنایتکارانه از خود بروز میدهند. انواع سادیسم: الف) سادیسم ذهنی که شخص صحنه های سادیستی را تجسم مینماید ولی اقدام به آزار دیگران…
❤1
سید اشرفالدین حسینی (Ashrafedin Hosseini) شاعر و مدیر روزنامه نسیم شمال: « دست مزن! چشم، ببستم دو دست راه مرو! چشم، دو پایم شکست حرف مزن! قطع نمودم سخن نطق مکن! چشم ببستم دهن هیچ نفهم! این سخن عنوان مکن خواهش نافهمی انسان مکن لال شوم کور شوم کر شوم لیک محال است که من خر شوم چند روی همچو خران زیر بار؟ سر ز فضای بشریت بر آر » ⚠️توجه: ارائه این مطلب به منزله موافقت صد درصدی بنده با این شخص و همه نظرات و آثار وی…
❤3
آه که هرچە بیشتر میان این مردمان عمر خویش را تباه میسازم، بیشتر آن رویِ این جاهلانِ عاقل نما برایم عیان میشود، همان خُردانِ به ظاهر عاقل ولی در اصل و باطن جاهل و از آن سو بیشتر و بهتر حال عاقلانِ دیوانه نما را درک میکنم، همان بزرگانِ به ظاهر دیوانه اما در اصل و باطن علامه. عاقلانِ دیوانهنمایی همچون بهلول... 📝 م. محمدنژاد @Han_Pen
❤1💔1
محمود حسابی (Mahmoud Hessabi) سناتور و فیزیکدان ایرانی: «جهان سوم جایی است که هر کسی بخواهد مملکتش را آباد کند، خانهاش خراب می شود و هر کسی بخواهد خانهاش آباد باشد، باید در تخریب مملکتش بکوشد.» ⚠️توجه: ارائه این پست به منزله موافقت صد درصدی بنده با این شخص و همه نظرات و آثار وی نمی باشد! @Han_Pen
❤2
گر به چندی از مدارس گذری کنیم و نظری بیندازیم، در کمال تأسف پی میبریم چه انسانهایی از دانشآموزان که هدر نمیرود و نیز چه سخنانی از معلمان و خودِ آنان که هدر نمیرود!! فکرش را بکن انسانِ هدر رفتهای باشی که میشد خیلی بهتر از اینها باشی اما الآن علاوه بر خودت، وقت و انرژی و سخنت هم هدر میرود... 📝م. محمدنژاد @Han_Pen
❤2
كنفوسیوس (Confucius) فیلسوف و نظریهپرداز چینی: « تعلیم ندادن کسی كه آماده آموختن است، انسان به هدر دادن است، تعلیم دادن کسی كه آماده آموختن نیست، سخن به هدر دادن است. خردمند نه انسان را به هدر می دهد و نه سخن را.» ⚠️توجه: ارائه این مطلب به منزله موافقت صد درصدی بنده با این شخص و همه نظرات و آثار وی نمی باشد! @Han_Pen
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bioqio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال بیو کیو :) متن پروفایل تکست انگیزشی دلنوشته عاشقانه بایو دخترونه نوشته کوتاه حس و حال خوب :)” (@bioqio), 2,411 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bioqio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.