4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,611–8,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 14:32
8,613
-13
8 Aug 2026, 09:41
8,626
+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:00
8,625
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:56
8,625
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 8,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
9 (11 May 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
2,997
Reactions total
173
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
119
Videos
16
Links
91
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
415 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5931374321384557692
190
45.8%
custom 5787182927703970020
167
40.2%
🤔
58
14.0%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bioomaks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как я впервые встретил акулу…
Есть такой миф, что акулы спят и видят, как бы кем-нибудь пообедать. Спасибо Спилбергу и «Челюстям» — целое поколение боится заходить в воду глубже, чем по пояс. Я, честно говоря, думал так же ровно до того момента, пока не оказался на Мальдивах.
Сначала я встретил рифовую акулу, когда нырял и немного напрягся. Думал, что на меня уже официально открыта охота. Но потом я увидел, что эти…
Я ЖЕНИЛСЯ
Если вам казалось, что я подозрительно затих в блоге — вот вам разгадка. Последние недели прошли в очень бодром режиме: организация свадьбы, куча форс-мажоров и прочие хлопоты. Что-то постить было физически некогда. Но повод, согласитесь, из тех, ради которых не жалко пропасть.
Мы с Екатериной теперь официально семья! Я долго шёл к этому шагу и до сих пор ловлю себя на мысли, что не до конца верю: вот оно…
Люди колют себе вещества, которые проверяли только на крысах
Сейчас очень много видео про пептиды: кто-то колет себе BPC-157, кто-то заказал эпиталон из Питера, кто-то ждёт посылку с GHK-Cu для лица. Все говорят про классные эффекты и про большую доказательную базу. Я полез смотреть, что это за исследования. Местами было неловко.
1️⃣ BPC-157
Начнём с BPC-157, потому что это, кажется, самый раскрученный пептид после…
Я обещал вторую часть про неприятные факты о жире — ловите.
Если первую не читал, мотни наверх, там основа: что такое висцеральный жир, почему весы врут и как тихое воспаление тлеет в нас годами. Теперь поговорим о том, что это воспаление в итоге устраивает.
Сначала про сосуды. Те самые молекулы воспаления и жирные кислоты, которые висцеральный жир выбрасывает в кровь, оставляют на стенках сосудов крошечные раны. О…
Ты 1000 раз слышал, что «жир плохо», но никто не говорит, что он реально делает с телом
Жир, который мы привыкли считать просто складками, на самом деле полноценный орган, рулящий нашим телом наравне с печенью. Просто всё обычно сводят к внешности и одежде и поэтому настоящую картину почти никто не проговаривает.
Сначала про то, откуда вообще взялась эта война с лишним весом. Миллионы лет человек добывал еду потом …
Есть психологический эффект, который 100 лет объясняет, почему ты не можешь сам наладить питание, начать ложиться вовремя или вытащить себя в зал, хотя знаешь, что надо.
Он открыт на заводе в США в 1920-х годах. И имя у него не самое известное, но именно он объясняет, почему абонементы в зал покупают тысячи, а ходят туда единицы.
Учёные на заводе Western Electric в 1920-х хотели выяснить простую вещь: как освещение…
А ведь это мог бы быть ты…
С такими классными результатами, если пройдёшь марафон (смотри отзывы выше ⬆️)
Если ещё сомневаешься нужен ли тебе марафон, посмотри на его начинку.
Что внутри:
📌 14 дней системы, которую я проверил на себе и на сотнях людей
📌 4 блока: сон, питание, стресс, активность. Всё, что нужно для стабильной энергии
📌 Простые уроки по 10 минут каждый день с домашними заданиями. Без воды, только …
В 1960-х в Японии было в 4 раза меньше депрессий, чем в США.
Сейчас, когда японцы массово перешли на бургеры, рамэн (или рамён?) с пшеничной лапшой и снеки из 7-Eleven, разрыв сократился до западных значений за два поколения. Это одно из прямых доказательств, что депрессия также часто связана не с проблемами в голове, а с тем, что клеткам не хватает строительного материала.
Ещё многие объясяют толерантность япноцев…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bioomaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 966,906 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БиоМакс” (@bioomaks), 8,613 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bioomaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
