Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bioinformatics Review

Channel

Bioinformatics Review

@bioinformaticsreview

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

245subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335518566
TypeChannel
Username@bioinformaticsreview
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bioinformaticsreview

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2452532497 August 2026 — 252 subscribers8 August 2026 — 252 subscribers16 August 2026 — 253 subscribers24 August 2026 — 252 subscribers30 August 2026 — 253 subscribers9 September 2026 — 252 subscribers16 September 2026 — 250 subscribers30 September 2026 — 249 subscribers12 October 2026 — 245 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 66 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 244–254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 13:16245-4
30 Sept 2026, 23:02249-1
16 Sept 2026, 23:41250-2
9 Sept 2026, 04:59252-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:57253+1
24 Aug 2026, 17:58252-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:37253+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:20252no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:25252first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Which docking software do you prefer?

  1. Autodock Vina50%
  2. Schrodinger17%
  3. MOE0%
  4. SMINA0%
  5. Autodock17%
  6. AI-based17%
  7. Other17%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Mar 2026, 11:26 UTC155 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

How to visualize a 3D structure using Py3Dmol? https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20260319/how-to-visualize-a-3d-structure-using-py3dmol/

20 Jan 2026, 14:39 UTC207 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AI Tools vs Traditional Tools in Bioinformatics- Which one to select? https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20260120/ai-tools-vs-traditional-tools-in-bioinformatics-which-one-to-select/

31 Oct 2025, 14:34 UTC293 viewsread 8 August 2026

Read the latest guest post on Bioinformatics Review https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20251031/ai-vs-physics-in-molecular-docking-towards-faster-and-more-accurate-pose-prediction/

2 Oct 2025, 08:42 UTC342 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

10 years of Bioinformatics Review: From a Blog to a Bioinformatics Knowledge Hub! https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20251002/10-years-of-bioinformatics-review-from-a-blog-to-a-bioinformatics-knowledge-hub/ Subscribe here: https://bioinformaticsreview.com/subscription/

28 Sept 2025, 13:47 UTC296 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hi, We would like to hear from you about your experience with Bioinformatics Review. Here is a simple Google Form. Kindly take some time to fill this out. Highly appreciated! Thank you! https://forms.gle/AE18vvvqsig196Ey7

11 Aug 2025, 09:44 UTC367 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Starting in Bioinformatics? Do This First! https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20250811/starting-in-bioinformatics-do-this-first/

3 Jun 2025, 17:21 UTC419 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[Editorial] Is it ethical to change the order of authors' names in a manuscript? https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20250603/editorial-is-it-ethical-to-change-the-order-of-authors-names-in-a-manuscript/

26 May 2025, 11:08 UTC382 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[Tutorial] Installing BBTools on Ubuntu (Linux). https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20250526/tutorial-installing-bbtools-on-ubuntu-linux/

25 Mar 2025, 03:24 UTC440 viewsread 8 August 2026

wes_data_analysis: Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) Data visualization Toolkit https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20250325/wes_data_analysis-whole-exome-sequencing-wes-data-visualization-toolkit/

9 Jan 2025, 13:04 UTC430 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[Editorial] Prioritizing Quality Over Quantity: Safeguarding the Integrity of Academic Research https://bioinformaticsreview.com/20250109/editorial-prioritizing-quality-over-quantity-safeguarding-the-integrity-of-academic-research/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bioinformaticsreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTCFinal Results6 voters

Which docking software do you prefer?

  1. Autodock Vina50%
  2. Schrodinger17%
  3. MOE0%
  4. SMINA0%
  5. Autodock17%
  6. AI-based17%
  7. Other17%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2024 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bioinformatics Review” (@bioinformaticsreview), 245 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bioinformaticsreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.