Channel
@binghegj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,241subscribers
+196 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004294225127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @binghegj |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 30 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/binghegj |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 1,241 | +31 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 1,210 | +19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 1,191 | +57 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 1,134 | +77 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 1,057 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:45 | 1,045 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (30 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 678 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#桑拿 #T台 #海选 #澳门 特色介绍： 🔥 T台走秀海选 🔥150位海外顶尖超模 🔥合法持牌一条龙打P 🔥水床服务，主题房，剧本杀，角色扮演 🔥满足持久增硬桩机 🔥颜值巅峰，满足你的高质量定制要求（所有技师都经过严格把关，对身高，身材，年龄都有严格要求培训上岗） 🙏预约请将你的需求告知客服，会为你推荐你相对应的需求场所 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 🚀🗻⛱ @kkk99885 频道订阅 ：https://t.me/binghegj
#澳门桑拿 9月份最新价格表 📣澳门桑拿8️⃣强🤣🤣🤣 所有各种类型优质红牌 📱 📱 📱 📱 📱 📱 📱📱 📱📱 📱📱 欧美 日韩超模助阵 应有尽有，身材颜值一绝，绝非外围的质量能比🔠 全澳商务接送（10分钟到位） 再送2个大堂师傅工 送果冻，悍马糖（持久增硬） 优惠💴200元每人 ♐️☸️💘💙☣️@kkk99885
🚗🚕🚙 #8月新场 #八汤御 淨桑拿 MOP 1,299門票・ 最低消費入場享用檜木乾蒸、玻璃蒸房與熱池大廳，更衣後即以 MOP 1,299 為最低消費。 👑上海式按摩SHANGHAI-STYLE MOP 2,199 經典手法傳統上海式全身按摩，桑拿後最經典的舒緩選擇。 🚩入門套餐ESSENTIAL MOP 2,899 – 3,399 雙鐘 999 – 1,600輕鬆體驗八湯御桑拿的基礎全身按摩套餐，兩個價位可選。 🔞人氣套餐SIGNATURE MOP 3,599 – 4,899 雙鐘 1,600 – 2,900多種手法可選的招牌全身按摩系列，最多貴客選擇的區間。 ⚠️尊享套餐ROYAL M…
澳门桑拿资讯 pinned a photo
澳门桑拿各大场所最新价格表 提前预约，无需排队，所有消费价格均按照澳门币汇率结算 🔔埃尔法商务接送（全澳10分钟到） 🔔赠送大堂按摩师傅工 🔔赠送悍马糖，泰国果冻（持久增硬） 🔔提供包房免费留宿过夜 ⚠️8月份所有场所消费价格均降价1000左右 🔥预约另外再优惠200元每人 立即预约 @kkk99885
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @binghegj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“澳门桑拿资讯” (@binghegj), 1,241 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binghegj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.