Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 10:25
4
-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:18
5
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:03
5
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 8 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
678 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🥰
165
24.3%
❤
163
24.0%
🔥
146
21.5%
👍
109
16.1%
😱
63
9.29%
🤩
18
2.65%
👏
14
2.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2023 to 18 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Some results from our VIP channel, where we trade on a daily basis on futures :)
#OP +186%
#BAKE +65%
#AAVE +140%
#DASH +100%
#SOL +63%
#ATOM +56%
#XLM +21%
#AXS +30%
#COTI +19%
+680% in one week.
Invite you all to our community:
@btcBoulevard
I almost forgot that I promised to give you a gift in honor of your frantic activity. 🙈
Once again, I want to thank everyone for the feedback and apologize for the absence in this channel, we were very busy analyzing the market with the guys in the VIP channel, which allowed us to take such profits.
I am sharing with you very useful information, which I hope will help you in your trading.
Briefly described the basi…
#BTC Update 🪙🪙🪙
What we have today.
Bitcoin rose on the release of fresh U.S. inflation data.
Between February 8 and 14 bitcoin took liquidity out of the $22.300 zone, dropping to the $21.300-$21.600 zone of interest.
The expected reversal to the $23.700-24.200 zone and an equally expected block in the $25.200 area, from which a strong reaction went.
What's next?
As described, $25.200 is a strong block.
We swiped…
OUR DEPOSITS ARE GETTING BIGGER 😎
Congratulations to all VIP members and unfortunate moment for those, who are still not the part of our community 😵🤪🤪
+220% of clear profit in only 2 hours of trading ✅🔥🔥🔥
This is a post in our closed VIP channel, I publish it for your understanding of how the signal looks like.
+ I will attach the final goal, which we successfully arrived at and fought off exactly from it
Still thinking of earning big money with us? :)
Now we are having a HUGE DISCOUNT PRICES for it.
1Month = ($199) NOW $79 ✅
Lifetime = ($699) NOW $199 ✅
BENEFITS OF IT (click)
COMMON QUESTIONS (click)
For more i…
❤26🥰25🔥15👍8👏6
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @binanceboulevard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@binanceboulevard named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@btcboulevard named in 3 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@binancesignalsboulevard named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance Boulevard (Futures) ®” (@binanceboulevard), 4 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binanceboulevard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.