Channel
@bikes_spb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,503subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001128403772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bikes_spb |
| Created | 26 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bikes_spb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 1,503 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:41 | 1,500 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 1,499 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 1,499 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,242 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350390152474664789 | 41 | 22.3% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 13.0% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 8.15% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 4.89% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 4.89% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.80% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 2.17% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.543% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.543% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bikes_spb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда в Петербурге строят новые велодорожки, затем чиновники начинают задаваться вопросом "Где же велосипедисты? Почему они не ездят по нашим велодорожкам? Вот же, мы для них все сделали". Но, если посмотреть на петербургские велодорожки с точки зрения обычного велосипедиста, то они выглядят примерно так, как на этом видео.
💯17😁14❤1
🏛️ Если вам интересен Петербург не просто как город с открытки, а как живой город и его удачными решениями, и его конфликтами, то эта папка для вас. В ней – каналы об урбанистике, архитектуре, транспорте, документах и городской культуре, которые помогают разобраться в происходящем немного лучше. 🟢Вороньи мысли — про урбанистику в России и Санкт-Петербурге, личном опыте городских проектов и происходящем вокруг. ⚫️ u…
👍7👎1
🚲 Велозаезд и лекцию о безопасности женщин в городе проведут проект «ТыНеОдна» и клуб «Сайклгелз» В среду, 29 июля, в 18:00 участницы велопрогулки соберутся у сада «Олимпия» на Московском проспекте, 44, чтобы проехать 28 километров по Петербургу. Все собранные в ходе встречи средства пойдут на помощь пострадавшим от домашнего насилия. Для участия необходима регистрация по ссылке. После заезда велосипедисты послушаю…
❤6👍3😁1
Вчера, 26 июля, «Петербургское велообщество» провело велозаезд по Васильевскому острову! 🚲✨ Собралась небольшая, но очень теплая и душевная компания. Васильевский остров в очередной раз доказал, что это прекрасное и комфортное место для велосипедных прогулок — главное знать правильные улочки улочки и огибать магистрали с плотным автомобильным трафиком. Тихие кварталы, морской бриз на намыве, душевные разговоры на …
custom 535039015247466478917🔥5🥰3👍1
В вашем городе пешеходам мешают на тротуарах электросамокаты и велосипеды, а бюджета на реализацию выделенных велодорожек нет? Решение: в рамках переразметки реализуйте велополосы.
💯19👎1
Уже послезавтра мы едем кататься по Ваське! Синоптики обещают хорошую погоду, так что, берём велосипеды и едем смотреть красивые места Васильевского острова, прокатимся по намыву, посмотрим малоизвестные, но от этого, не менее интересные места на острове. Чтобы поехать с нами, регистрируйтесь: https://bikes-spb.timepad.ru/event/4091420/ Осталось всего 3 места!
👌2👍1custom 53503901524746647891
«Городские данные для светофорного регулирования и не только» Москва узнает о себе через терабайты данных с камер, детекторов и валидаторов. Вопрос в том, как эти данные превратить в реальную пользу для города, а не в очередной отчет. Транспортный комплекс Москвы это умеет! Расскажет о том, как это происходит на лекции Софья Гринкевич, заместитель начальника светофорного управления ГКУ «ЦОДД», автор тг-канала «Урба…
❤5
⏳ До велопрогулки по Васильевскому острову остались считанные дни. Велосипед — отличный городской транспорт: без бензина, без пробок и с прекрасными видами по пути. Так что берём велосипед, хорошее настроение — и отправляемся в путь. Будем любоваться архитектурой Васильевского острова, видами на залив и просто душевно общаться. 🚲 26 июля, 14:00 📍 Маршрут — 17 км Количество мест — 20 участников. Осталась половина …
🕊3
По Васильевскому острову на велосипеде Погода отличная, а значит — самое время сесть на велосипед и прокатиться в хорошей компанией по Васильевскому острову. Велосипед — это отличная альтернатива автомобилю, так как велосипеду не нужен бензин, и ему не страшны никакие пробки. Так что берём велосипед, хорошее настроение — и едем кататься по Ваське. Будем наслаждаться красотой архитектуры, классными видами на залив, …
🥰3👎1
Велоквест в Кронштадте, или квест «Попади в Кронштадт, если ты велосипедист» На днях Николая Гарнова — автора концепции «Кабинет велосипедиста», победившей в проекте «Твой бюджет» и впоследствии реализованной силами Городского центра управления парковками (ГЦУП), — пригласили на официальный велоквест в Кронштадте. Организатором мероприятия выступил тот же ГЦУП. Заявленная цель была вполне практичной: протестировать…
🫡9custom 53503901524746647895❤1🤔1🤬1😭1
Итоги встречи с Пассажиравтотрансом Месяца два назад «Петербургское велообщество» направило в Комитет по транспорту обращение с предложением организовать для водителей автобусов тренинги по безопасному объезду велосипедистов. В ответ мы получили приглашение на базу «Пассажиравтотранса» — обсудить вопросы взаимодействия велосипедистов и общественного транспорта. Встреча состоялась сегодня, 7 июля. Мы говорили не толь…
custom 535039015247466478918❤9👍4🔥2🤔2
🤔 Почему велосипедисты — самые счастливые люди на дорогах? — Да я на этом велосипеде опоздаю, приеду потный и злой 🤬 — один из частых аргументов, который встречается, когда речь идёт о том, чтобы попробовать использовать велосипед в качестве транспорта, чтобы добираться до работы, учёбы, и в другие места. Логика понятна: машина же быстрее и комфортнее, а на велике — это только по паркам кататься. Но если посмотреть…
👍12🥰3❤2👎1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bikes_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 111,671 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Петербургское велообщество” (@bikes_spb), 1,503 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bikes_spb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.