GOOD DAY FAMILY …… 💯🙏🎉🏆 NEW DAY TO MAKE MILLIONS FROM INSTANT VIRTUALS 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22

Channel
bigomargames09
@bigomargames09
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,449subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001767671122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bigomargames09 |
| Description | 𝐆𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐌𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐓, 𝐈 𝐖𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐓𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐃 🏆✅ 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 🇩🇪𝐅𝐈𝐗𝐄𝐃 𝐏𝐔𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑 💯𝟏𝟎𝟎% 𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐄❗️🔱 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐈𝐒 𝐌𝐘 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐓 𝐓𝐄𝐗𝐓 𝐀𝐃MIN @BIG_OMAR22 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bigomargames09 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 21,449 | +44 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 21,405 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 21,416 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.63%
- avg views ÷ 21,449 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 349
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.592%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (20 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,978 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,800
- Videos
- ≈365
- Links
- ≈2,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 34m 00s
- Average length
- 2m 16s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 87.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Text me here 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22
Make sure you will take the games very serious then try then win something big before you will go to bed
Text me here 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22
bigomargames09 pinned a video
Get your predictions package and tart winning big 🏆🏆🎉🏆🏆 It’s working perfectly well guys 🎉🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 Don’t watch us win …but win with us ❤️🏆😂🎉 Tap on the link for your prediction package ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ http://www.instavirtualshubs.com http://www.instavirtualshubs.com Or text me here 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22
❤3
Make sure you will take the games very serious then try then win something big 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Voice message, posted without a caption
I hope you’re also winning 🙌🏻🙌🏻💯 If you don’t understand anything or you’re facing any challenges text me I’m online 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22
❤3
bigomargames09 pinned a video
Text me here 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/BIG_OMAR22
Take your time please
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @bigomargames09. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 367,307 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MRTONICCOMUNITYYY · 176,187
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@White5331 · 64,549
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bigomargames09” (@bigomargames09), 21,449 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigomargames09.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.