Kinda chic viral yep
π₯21π20π14β€12

Channel
@biggemsofficial
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
81,277subscribers
+10,999 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002378439864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biggemsofficial |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biggemsofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 81,277 | -455 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 81,732 | +14,550 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 67,182 | -401 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 67,583 | -823 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 68,406 | -670 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 69,076 | -517 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 69,593 | -685 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 70,278 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 70,278 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (29 July 2026 β 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 193,465 |
| Reactions total | 2,398 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,398 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 749 | 31.2% | |
| π₯ | 735 | 30.7% | |
| π | 725 | 30.2% | |
| π | 183 | 7.63% | |
| π | 2 | 0.083% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 0.083% | |
| π | 2 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,398reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @biggemsofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Kinda chic viral yep
π₯21π20π14β€12
Kinda $CHIC Gem A trend this popular makes this market cap criminally low Considering how coins like this have previously skyrocketed to million-dollar market caps, weβre still early Just look at how many celebrities and companies are using this phrase on Instagram, TikTok, and X KINDA CHIC MODE ON HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump
β€40π39π29π₯24
Sticker, posted without a caption
β€23π₯22π20π19
Found something speacial and viral Notificatioins on π₯
π12π₯12β€11π11
Βπͺ Karate Cat ($KAT) β π #SOL | π±3h | ποΈ1.1K π Stats β USD $0.0β2456 (-23%) β MC $23.6K β Vol $70.8K β LP $5.7K β Sup 958.8M/958.8M β 1H -7.2% π 121 β107 β ATH $36K (-35% / 2h) π Socials β π β’ TG β’ Web β’ [about] π Security β Fresh 13% 1D | 28% 7D β Top 10 16% | 334 (total) β TH 3.5|1.7|1.6|1.6|1.5 β Bundler 14 (7.9%) β Insider 3 (2.8%) β Dev Sold π’ π ³ β DEX Paid β¦
π19π19β€17π₯13
Βπͺ NET BOY ($NETBOY) β π #SOL | π±1d | ποΈ564 π Stats β USD $0.0003275 (-11%) β MC $312.8K β Vol $135.5K β LP $21K β Sup 954.9M/954.9M β 1H -32% π 69 β78 β ATH $608.6K (-49% / 23h) π Socials [10d] β π [β½] β’ TG β’ Web β’ [about] π Security β Fresh 23% 1D | 23% 7D β Top 10 55% | 320 (total) β TH 39.8|1.8|1.8|1.8|1.8 β Insider 19 (17%) β Dev Sold π’ π ³ β DEX Paid π’ [info] β¦
π37π₯31π18πΎ2
$SLVR has buybacks every 90 seconds. (INSANE) Burns happen every round so 2% of the round buys and burns $SLVR, the math behind this is pretty crazy so i suggest not missing out on the oppertunity. (Wallet below) https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2944d4ea031cfb316572a7b0a4afe912a5757dec0d6be757afff4cae0a110ef1 If the pot has 0.10 ETH per round on average the daily buyback total would be $4,800 per day. If the pβ¦
β€46π₯45π39π2
Join me in Ansemβs live lol π
π22π₯19π15β€12
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1pJkOXXMjqoJj
π19β€18π15π₯14
$BUSHOUSE IS BACK The community has officially taken over $BUSHOUSE ππ Inspired by the real South Korean proposal to transform retired buses into affordable homes, this meme has a real story behind it β and now weβre bringing Bus House to Solana. π. π₯ Community takeover π Unique narrative π Strong meme potential β‘ Solana ecosystem This is just the beginning. CA: EUB1eZBt4m3X4FbperWnKGJdvLsuLMu2YmJix5yjpump Letββ¦
π₯24β€16π16π12
Good morning! Letβs start printing π₯
π₯24β€19π17π17
Achievement Unlocked: x5! π @biggemsofficial made a x5+ call on EstateX (Wormho.... $799K β‘οΈ $4M π View Call π View Stats β‘οΈAuto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!
π₯27π23β€19
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @biggemsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 804,475 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ±πΈπΆ πΆπ΄πΌπ πΎπ΅π΅πΈπ²πΈπ°π»β (@biggemsofficial), 81,277 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biggemsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.