Channel
@bigfatsurprise
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002171148125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bigfatsurprise |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bigfatsurprise |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 6 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2025 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Small but vocal group continue to insist that saturated fat is not harmful," says @CSPI in a letter to @BrookeLRollins & @RobertKennedyJr Cites me and @TyRBeal Really, CSPI? Have you not read the last 15y of science on these fats? 23 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, nearly all conclude that sat fats have NO EFFECT on cardiovascular or total mortality. Authors include 5 former Dietary Guidelines committee member…
❤1
Incredibly interesting tweet on the ketogenic diet and cancer. The mechanisms are not just glucose as cancer fuel. https://x.com/I_mitochondria/status/1930600984603988155?t=Bpgr1F2Hty1pGIOwZdiTxg&s=19
🔥🥛Senate passes the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act to get full-fat milk back in schools!! Now the bill must be conferenced with the House version. Senate version allows for plant-based milks if student's parent or MD requests Whole milk is a win for children 👏👏
Do people realize how sinister this is? The suggestion here is to not just give up your car or your air travel to save the planet. You're being asked to give up your health. Seed oils oxidize and drive inflammation in the body. But human health is evidently not all that valuable to the Times, which put a climate reporter on this story (FYI: there are other, better ways to preserve the environment other than risking p…
New study: In menopausal women, hyperinsulinemia and other markers of metabolic syndrome are strongly associated with abnormal uterine bleeding. Preliminary research. Metabolic syndrome is driven by a diet high in sugars and starches, implying that this condition could potentially be reversed by reducing consumption of those foods. (I don't see that the study is online yet)
"Femtech" refers to all the new apps, wearables, etc that are being marketed to women as a way to take control of our health. Do they help? washingtonpost.com/health/2025/06… Or is this new "wellness tech" which collects some of our most personal data, more like the New Pharma, distracting us from root cause solutions to chronic disease, much like the Old Pharma? This piece does a great job of exploring some of th…
LinkedIn flagged my post on ultra-processed meat not causing cancer as "misinformation." Every factual statement in that piece is documented and true.
Processed meats do not cause colorectal cancer. The WHO report on this was effectively rigged and did not represent the science. @foundmyfitness I worry that "ultra-processed foods" will be used to try to eliminate deli meats, which maybe not ideal are still the most affordable source of protein for most Americans. This would be a big mistake. unsettledscience.substack.com/p/do-red-and-p… https://x.com/foundmyfitne…
Studies showing benefits of red meat are rife with conflicts of interest--says NYT. We never see similar reporting on studies promoting plant-based foods. Because the media only calls out it out for meat. While giving a pass to Nestle, Pepsi, Unilever, etc. Preferred narrative, bias...call it what you want. But it's been going on for decades and has done much to make us believe that red meat science alone is corrupt…
This entire article is just snark and innuendo. The author drips with sarcasm at even the idea that you might want to control your blood sugar. (Chronic diseases ravaging America not mentioned.) I used to love and admire this magazine, but this type of reporting makes me cringe https://x.com/NewYorker/status/1925708387288789178?t=2QRBhtHuqjlYRuT4TsOyQg&s=19
At the White House for announcement of the MAHA Commission Report!
The MAHA Commission report is out! The focus for food policy is to reduce ultra processed foods which are those high in sugar and refined grains, but also, in some places, saturated fats. Research agenda for the future talks about low carbohydrate diets! static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/d…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bigfatsurprise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nina Teicholz, PhD” (@bigfatsurprise), 6 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigfatsurprise.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.