Channel

$BCZ Community Portal

@bigcz_bep20

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003390936051
Type	Channel
Username	@bigcz_bep20
Description	Big CZ - The Heaviest Meme on BSC! 💛🏆 TG: t.me/bigcz_bep20 Web: https://bigcz.meme X: https://x.com/bigcz_bep20 CA: 0xE830C3d6d114bcfF028f56817cC7d12f4224A1eF
Created	19 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/bigcz_bep20

Growth

2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
9 Aug 2026, 01:00	131	no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:16	131	first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 2
Links: 2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
🔥	26	39.4%
❤	24	36.4%
🤡	6	9.09%
⚡	3	4.55%
👏	3	4.55%
🤩	3	4.55%
👍	1	1.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 25 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 461,033 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Gumball’s Gem Calls
@gumballsgemcalls01 · 4,4094 posts 𝗖𝗜𝗥𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗧
@CircleOfTrust · 1,1042 posts Basedalpha Gambles 🎲
@Basedmancalls · 391 post Info Seputar Crypto
@MasJokoCrypto · 3781 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Safeguard
@safeguard · 245,2651 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$BCZ Community Portal” (@bigcz_bep20), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigcz_bep20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.