📱📱WS蓝标认证,全球定制,一手渠道

Channel
【表妹號铺】微信快手抖音QQ请订阅防失联
@biaomeihp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,146subscribers
-1,750 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002994658002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biaomeihp |
| Description | 全能号铺 一手资源 应有尽有 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biaomeihp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 17,146 | -209 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 17,355 | -125 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:39 | 17,480 | -159 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 17,639 | -360 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 17,999 | -139 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 18,138 | -190 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 18,328 | -127 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 18,455 | -164 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 18,619 | -96 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 18,715 | -149 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 18,864 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 18,896 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.65%
- avg views ÷ 17,146 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 627
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.043%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (9 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,892 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 206
- Videos
- 42
- Links
- 20
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😞😞云机红标实名有货,需要的老铁dd
📱最新技术最好提前预定 🉑接粉爆粉 ⚠️客户跟本人都已亲测 🉑马上使用🉑当天加20-50个 🉑马上使用🉑当天加20-50个 🉑马上使用🉑当天加20-50个 云机直接转移 海外版 vmos.com
纯香港🇭🇰6-12月手持护照 可加人 进群 视频号 进企业 额度10万 包收付 纯香港非换绑,封号可解
❤1
📱📱手表微信到货,需要改一切资料包装都提前发来 最i玩 云机,直接登录账号上 自己准备设备 vmos我这边直接转移 需要的大哥来滴滴我 养号养三天 用的的时候需要一个私人号先加这些号通过后 在去使用就正常了不爆红和不境外
❤1
😞😞企业微信前两天扫号死了很多,重新上新,库存已补货,欢迎下单😡😡😡 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 企业自助发货机器人🤖 @biaomei888bot 微信支付宝请移步店铺发卡网下单😘😚
国内限制号带资料有货 成年带资料已完善 62或者爱思上 跑分首选,数量不多
😁😁 国卡QQ真绑单太,自挂满月带月卡,不是虚卡扫出来的,包登录包弹窗包爆红 全网最低价
🔥🔥🔥 📱国内1-3月18位实名带资料 带支付密码 不包收付 📱国内1-3月18位实名绑卡支付冻结 带资料 📱国内1-3月微信/视频号 18位双实名 带资料 📱国内1-3月微信/视频号 18位双实名 +橱窗+蓝v 😅国内3月-1年护照料实名 可加人 😅国内3-8年港澳通行证实名 可加人 😅国内1月-3月老外手持护照实名 包支付 带手持护照资料 😅国内满年18位实名 包支付 带18正反 限制了还可以用限制号收付 香港🇭🇰半年通行证 包视频号 香港🇭🇰半年通行证 包进企业 香港🇭🇰半年通行证 包可支付 香港🇭🇰半年私人换绑 可加人加群 香港🇭🇰1-8年18位实名死密 可加人加群 香港🇭🇰3-8年通行证实名 可加人加群
来咯来咯‼️‼️‼️‼️ 美国🇭🇰真‼️‼️护照支付宝!! 现货秒发 !! 上号第一时间检查是否实名,支付密码, 🔥🔥售后发货一小时内反馈。。不包出售后的违规。
😬🙄😬🙄 😋😋【快手实名冲锋号】:刚激活过的实名快手号,超耐操,上号可以直接改资料,打私信,发作品,新老都有‼️ 需要(快手实名号)就拿这种,稳如泰山,用过的客户无限复购‼️ 😎安卓上号流程:备份包➕分身大师➕导入数据🟰登录成功 😎苹果上号流程:爱思包➕电脑用爱思助手恢复🟰登录成功 ✅售后:包登录,包24小时内不会自动掉线,包7天内不跳二次激活。5天内找回包换 功能自测。
📱📱抖音国卡百粉/千粉/万粉,直登或带设备,🉐特价
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @biaomeihp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 932,695 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【表妹號铺】微信快手抖音QQ请订阅防失联” (@biaomeihp), 17,146 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biaomeihp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.