Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ovo

Channel

Ovo

@bfra6

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002900595348
TypeChannel
Username@bfra6
Created22 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bfra6

Growth

8513 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 85 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 17:36 — 85 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:0214 Aug 2026, 17:36
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:3685no change
13 Aug 2026, 08:0285first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54292594014353089501926.0%
custom 54226208122197915121824.7%
custom 58774683801259902421115.1%
custom 5429159577805405414912.3%
custom 528972275587116290068.22%
custom 542946493280028330345.48%
custom 543157009813551382434.11%
custom 585947699834625084822.74%
custom 587518011174499560411.37%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2026, 09:01 UTC371 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54292594014353089504custom 54294649328002833034custom 52897227558711629002custom 58751801117449956041

17 Feb 2026, 22:00 UTC387 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54292594014353089506custom 58774683801259902424custom 54226208122197915122

10 Feb 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,820 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54292594014353089506custom 54226208122197915124custom 52897227558711629001custom 58774683801259902421

10 Feb 2026, 12:04 UTC736 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54226208122197915127custom 54291595778054054143custom 58774683801259902422custom 58594769983462508481

9 Feb 2026, 01:12 UTC854 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52897227558711629003custom 54226208122197915123custom 54291595778054054141custom 54315700981355138241custom 58774683801259902421

6 Feb 2026, 18:42 UTC906 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54291595778054054145custom 54292594014353089503custom 58774683801259902423custom 54226208122197915122custom 54315700981355138242custom 58594769983462508481

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bfra6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,080,661 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ovo” (@bfra6), 85 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bfra6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.