Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BFE Talk | پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای 🦋

Channel

BFE Talk | پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای 🦋

@bfe_talk

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,538subscribers

+4,426 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964837897
TypeChannel
Username@bfe_talk
Descriptionگفتن درباره‌ی خواندن، شنیدن و دیدن اگه با کست‌باکس مشکل دارید، این‌جا می‌تونید اپیزودهامون رو بشنوید🦋
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bfe_talk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,1127,5385,3256 August 2026 — 3,112 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,183 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,208 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,361 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,410 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,549 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,692 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,063 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,353 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,502 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,502 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,762 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,888 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,912 subscribers2 October 2026 — 5,488 subscribers8 October 2026 — 5,662 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,740 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,105 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,226 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,324 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,557 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,651 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,223 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,406 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,538 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +4,426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,448–8,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 08:507,538+132
4 Nov 2026, 12:197,406+183
1 Nov 2026, 12:197,223+572
29 Oct 2026, 01:496,651+94
26 Oct 2026, 03:376,557+233
22 Oct 2026, 20:386,324+98
19 Oct 2026, 22:186,226+121
16 Oct 2026, 20:586,105+365
13 Oct 2026, 22:105,740+78
8 Oct 2026, 12:215,662+174
2 Oct 2026, 01:185,488+576
16 Sept 2026, 08:554,912+24
12 Sept 2026, 18:174,888+126
8 Sept 2026, 18:554,762+260
3 Sept 2026, 12:484,502no change
3 Sept 2026, 10:284,502+149
31 Aug 2026, 11:054,353+290
28 Aug 2026, 08:544,063+371
25 Aug 2026, 11:063,692+143
22 Aug 2026, 02:363,549first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 26 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.1%
avg views ÷ 7,538 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held27 (26 October 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total120,290
Reactions total1,389
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
99
Videos
117
Links
59

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19m 54s
Average length
1m 59s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,389 reactions across 27 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤84660.9%
🔥17712.7%
❤‍🔥997.13%
💔584.18%
👍402.88%
🤡402.88%
😁362.59%
🤣312.23%
😭161.15%
👎151.08%
🍾70.504%
🗿60.432%
👏50.36%
😢30.216%
🥰30.216%
🏆20.144%
💯20.144%
⚡10.072%
😐10.072%
🤯10.072%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,389 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,650 views50 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

سلام به رفیق عزیز دوردست‌ها🌎🫂 ~پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای

❤36💔14

7 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈2,440 views29 reactionsread 9 November 2026

کدوم اپیزود اثر پروانه‌ای رو باید زیر بارون گوش کرد؟ @bfe_talk 🦋

❤28👎1

7 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC≈2,610 views66 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

«مدتی باران و تاریکی را گوش کردم. چه لذتی دارد از فردای نیامده نترسیدن، گوش به باران‌ دادن، چای درست کردن، پادشاه وقت خود بودن.» روزها در راه | شاهرخ مسکوب ~پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای

❤63👍2⚡1

5 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC≈3,160 views39 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

کلاس کنترل خشم❌ تصادف عمدی ✅ @bfe_talk 🦋

🤣28❤5👍3🗿2😐1

5 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,160 views32 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

درباره‌ی تتلو 🎤 @bfe_talk 🦋

❤24👍3🗿3👎2

5 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC≈3,370 views40 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

اثر پروانه‌ای | قسمت ۱۰۴ حدیث کرمی —موزیسین مهراد هیدن، شایع و رضا صادقی؛ قصه‌ی حدیث کرمی، یک درامر زن 📺دیدن از یوتیوب @bfe_talk 🦋

❤40

5 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC≈3,410 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
File

اثر پروانه‌ای | قسمت ۱۰۴ حدیث کرمی —موزیسین مهراد هیدن، شایع و رضا صادقی؛ قصه‌ی حدیث کرمی، یک درامر زن @bfe_talk 🦋

❤36💯1🤯1

3 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC≈4,340 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

این شات برای کدوم فیلمه؟ لِول سختی: شش از ده @bfe_talk 🦋

❤16👍1

3 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC≈4,080 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

این شات برای کدوم فیلمه؟ لِول سختی: سه از ده @bfe_talk 🦋

🤡40❤1

3 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈4,040 views27 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

این شات برای کدوم فیلمه؟ لِول سختی: شش از ده @bfe_talk 🦋

🔥22❤4👍1

3 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,030 views19 reactionsread 9 November 2026
File

روز بارونی‌تون بخیر 🌧️ ~پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای

❤17👍1💯1

2 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC≈4,470 views13 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Poll

کدوم سریال محبوبته؟

  1. Ted Lasso45%
  2. The Sopranos62%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤11👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @bfe_talk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll944 voters

کدوم سریال محبوبته؟

  1. Ted Lasso45%
  2. The Sopranos62%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BFE Talk | پادکست اثر پروانه‌ای 🦋” (@bfe_talk), 7,538 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bfe_talk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.