Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BEZ PRAVOK®

@bezpravok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,705subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195859953
TypeChannel
Username@bezpravok
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bezpravok

Growth

3,7053,7123,708.56 August 2026 — 3,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,710 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,705 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,704–3,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:253,705-5
10 Aug 2026, 16:533,710-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:073,712no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:063,712first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

895 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁32436.2%
20022.3%
💯13114.6%
🔥11713.1%
🤣728.04%
💅374.13%
🤯121.34%
😢20.223%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 895reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Dec 2025, 09:41 UTC≈1,610 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тимлид: не закрывать никакие задачи @bezpravok

18💯14😁11🔥7

29 Dec 2025, 10:54 UTC≈1,730 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Никогда не доводите ситуацию до пятой правки @bezpravok

💯85🤣2

26 Dec 2025, 11:09 UTC≈1,680 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Понятно, это на будущий год не загадываем @bezpravok

😁191

25 Dec 2025, 14:49 UTC≈1,690 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Жиза? @bezpravok

😁23💯7🤣5😢1

24 Dec 2025, 15:03 UTC≈1,580 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кирилл Борисов, креативный директор и продюсер @kinemotor_production, собрал в нейронках клип по BEZ PRAVOK. Еще и трек сам сгенерил 👁 Ищите себя в видосе и кидайте друзьям. Вместе покачаемся под гимн всех, кто даёт и получает правки 🔥

🔥236💅4🤯4

23 Dec 2025, 10:34 UTC≈1,700 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подсказка: его здесь нет @bezpravok

😁48🤣63

22 Dec 2025, 12:13 UTC≈1,620 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

И это не сон с температурой под 40 @bezpravok

😁16💅14🔥3

19 Dec 2025, 09:12 UTC≈1,860 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Если бы общение в чате с коллегами было таким, правки вносились бы веселее @bezpravok

😁158

18 Dec 2025, 11:11 UTC≈2,100 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Согласны? Узнали? @bezpravok

30💯26🤣10🤯5

17 Dec 2025, 13:04 UTC≈1,730 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BEZ PRAVOK глазами Директора Всего 👀

🔥147

17 Dec 2025, 10:40 UTC≈1,740 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Дизайнера джуна позвали на встречу с клиентом @bezpravok

😁34

16 Dec 2025, 08:49 UTC≈1,940 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мечта всех, кто работает с правками @bezpravok

😁26💯9🔥54

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bezpravok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 151,250 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BEZ PRAVOK®” (@bezpravok), 3,705 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezpravok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.